--- title: "Supply Chain Climate Risk: Map, Measure and Monitor Supplier Exposure" description: How to map supply chain climate risk across supplier tiers, measure hazard exposure at site level with public data, and keep it under review for ESRS E1. image: https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/pexels-cluster-images/4759281.jpg --- [Skip to content](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/identify-manage-hidden-climate-risks-supply-chain#main-content) [![Fiegenbaum Solutions Logo](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/Branding/Fiegenbaum-Solutions_Logo.svg) ![Fiegenbaum Solutions Logo](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/Branding/Fiegenbaum-Solutions_Logo.svg)](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/?hsLang=en) - [English](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/identify-manage-hidden-climate-risks-supply-chain) - [Deutsch](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/blog/verborgene-klimaexposition-in-deiner-wertschopfungs-kette-und-wie-du-sie-heute-messen-kannst) - Services - [Climate Risk Assessment](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/climate-risk-analysis-for-companies) - [VSME Report](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/vsme-reporting-for-smes) - [ESG Due Diligence VCs & Series A+](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/esg-due-diligence-vcs-series-a-startups) - [Product Carbon Footprint](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/product-carbon-footprint-lifecycle-assessment) - [Corporate Carbon Footprint](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/company-carbon-footprint-methods-tools-best-practice) - Solutions - [Materiality Screening](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/double-materiality-analysis-definition-process-best-practice#fs-screening) - [Atlas](https://atlas.fiegenbaum.solutions/en) - [Load Profile Check](https://atlas.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/lastgang-check) - [Pricing](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/esg-climate-consulting-fixed-prices-carbon-footprint-vsme-due-diligence-climate-risk) - [About me](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/about-me) - [Blog](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog) - [Contact](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/contact) ###### 8 min read # Climate Risk Supply Chain: Identify Hidden Exposures & Build Resilience By: [Johannes Fiegenbaum](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/author/johannes-fiegenbaum) on 7/29/25, 11:26 AM · Last updated October 17, 2026 [Climate Risk Assessment](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/tag/climate-risk-assessment) [Supply Chain & EUDR](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/tag/supply-chain-eudr) ![Iceberg in the sea under dark clouds](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/pexels-cluster-images/4759281.jpg) A supplier does not have to be in a disaster zone to stop delivering. Flood, drought, wildfire and heat hit the sites your suppliers depend on, and the effect reaches you as a longer lead time or a production stop. This guide covers how to map that exposure across supplier tiers, measure it at site level, keep it under review, and report it under [CSRD](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/csrd-climate-risk-reporting-companies-2025-eu?hsLang=en). **Live data:** see how physical climate hazards such as flooding, drought and heat hit specific locations in the [Fiegenbaum Atlas climate risk dashboard](https://atlas.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/klimarisiko?utm_source=fiegenbaum-solutions&utm_medium=blog&utm_campaign=atlas-klimarisiko&utm_content=identify-manage-hidden-climate-risks-supply-chain). ## How to Map Climate Risks Across Supplier Tiers Tier 1 suppliers are the ones you contract with and can name. Tier 2 and sub-tier suppliers are the ones your Tier 1 partners depend on, and that is where most physical exposure sits unseen. Two patterns turn an ordinary hazard into a business risk: single sourcing and site concentration. If four Tier 1 suppliers buy the same input from one Tier 2 site, you have one point of failure. | **Hazard** | **Where it usually sits** | **Exposure indicator** | **Public data source** | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | **Flooding** | Tier 1 plants, logistics hubs | Site in a 100-year flood zone, closure days | EEA flood maps, flood cadastres | | **Heat** | Tier 2 process industry, warehousing | Days above 30 degrees, cooling-dependent steps | Copernicus C3S, DWD | | **Drought** | Sub-tier water and hydropower dependent | Low-flow days, water stress | EU Joint Research Centre | | **Wildfire** | Sub-tier raw material, remote grid links | Burnt area probability | Copernicus EFFIS | | **Storm and hail** | Tier 1 sites, open stock, rooftop solar | Historic hail days, gust return periods | National weather services | | **Transition pressure** | Energy-intensive Tier 2 suppliers | Energy intensity, carbon price pass-through | EU ETS data | Energy dependency is the example most maps miss. A Tier 1 assembly supplier looks unexposed, but its aluminium comes from a smelter whose power rests on one hydropower region. A dry summer lifts spot prices, the smelter throttles output, and the cut reaches your line weeks later. The hazard is drought, the exposed asset is in Tier 2, and the damage is measured in lead time. Geopolitical risk compounds the same weak points, because a single-source site under climate stress is also the one with no alternative. ## How to Measure Exposure at Supplier Site Level Exposure is measured per site, not per company. A supplier with twelve plants has twelve risk profiles, and the group average hides all of them. Five steps: - **Get addresses, not company names.** Coordinates for every Tier 1 production site, plus the sub-tier sites your Tier 1 partners will disclose. - **Pull hazard data per coordinate.** Copernicus C3S and EFFIS across Europe, DWD for German sites, the EEA and the US EPA for regional aggregates, [IPCC AR6 WG II](https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/) for direction of travel. - **Choose the scenario pair.** An intermediate and a high emissions pathway, so you see the spread rather than one number. The [scenario choice](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/choosing-right-ssp-scenario-climate-resilient-business?hsLang=en) drives the result more than the hazard model does. - **Translate hazard into operations.** Expected downtime days, lead time extension, single-source share affected. A flood score with no downtime estimate [cannot be prioritised](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/physical-risks-and-transition-risks-how-to-assess-climate-risks?hsLang=en#how-to-prioritise-physical-climate-risks-across-sites). - **Record the baseline.** Write down the assumptions, so next year is a comparison and not a fresh start. Suppliers hold the data you cannot buy: backup power, water permits, whether the site has flooded before. Long ESG questionnaires fail here, because they land with someone who has no reason to answer. Two operational questions do get answers: which exact site produces our part, and what happened the last time production stopped there. **My position:** automated supplier climate scoring is a starting point, not an audit-proof result. Screening tools are useful for narrowing hundreds of suppliers to the few dozen worth a real look. They are not evidence. Any score that ends up in a report needs a named data source, a stated scenario and a documented threshold behind it. ## How to Keep Supplier Climate Risk Under Ongoing Review A one-off assessment ages badly in the parts that change fastest and not at all in the parts everyone re-runs out of habit. Sites move and sourcing shares shift, hazard projections barely budge. | **What you review** | **Trigger** | **Frequency** | | --- | --- | --- | | **Tier 1 site addresses** | New supplier, relocation | Yearly | | **Single-source and concentration list** | Sourcing decision | Quarterly | | **Downtime and lead time incidents** | Any disruption | After each event | | **Adaptation measures at critical suppliers** | Audit, contract renewal | Yearly | | **Hazard scores per site** | New climate dataset release | Every three years | | **Scenario set and thresholds** | New IPCC assessment cycle | Not in between | After an event, re-check three things and nothing else: how long the supplier needed to restart, whether the outage matched the modelled downtime, and whether an alternative source was genuinely available. Near misses count too. A supplier that stayed up because a levee held is exposed, not resilient. ## Where Value Chain Climate Risk Lands in CSRD and ESRS E1 Reporting Supplier exposure is a named disclosure, not a side note. Under the [ESRS delegated regulation](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/2772/oj), ESRS E1 asks for a [climate resilience](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/climate-resilience-investing-adaptation-economic-benefits?hsLang=en) analysis covering the value chain and for the anticipated financial effects of physical and transition risks. That is what a site-level supplier assessment produces: which hazard, which site, which scenario, what it costs. Scoping guidance comes from [EFRAG](https://www.efrag.org/). The [EU Taxonomy](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/eu-taxonomy-checklist-for-companies?hsLang=en) pulls on the same data. The do no significant harm criterion for climate adaptation in the [Climate Delegated Act](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2021/2139/oj) requires a climate risk and vulnerability assessment for the activity, including relevant parts of the value chain. One assessment serves both. On materiality, the practical trigger is concentration. A hazard at a supplier carrying a large share of one input, with no qualified alternative, crosses the line even when the absolute exposure looks modest. The reporting obligation itself now applies to companies above 1,000 employees and 450 million euros net turnover, for financial years from 2027. ## From Assessment to a Costed Adaptation Plan A screening result becomes useful when each prioritised risk has a measure, an owner and a number. Cut the ranked list where downtime or single-source share stops being tolerable, and give every remaining item one accountable person in procurement plus a budget line. Measures that earn their cost: dual sourcing for concentrated inputs, contractual restart and notification duties, buffer stock sized to the modelled downtime, and physical protection at the supplier site where a joint investment beats a switch. Concentration is what makes this affordable. In a climate risk analysis for a southern German dealer group with multiple sites, the majority of the quantified exposure was physical, driven mainly by hail and heavy rain, and hail had already been documented at several of the locations. A handful of sites carried a disproportionate share of the physical risk. Supplier portfolios have the same shape, so treating every supplier equally is the most reliable way to spend a budget without reducing risk. Where the exposure sits with a supplier rather than with you, the plan item is a conversation, not a capital request: ask what is already in place, then put the answer in the contract. For tracking measures and evidence, see [climate risk management technology](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/physical-risks-and-transition-risks-how-to-assess-climate-risks?hsLang=en). ## FAQs How can supply chain managers measure climate risk to operations? Measure per site, not per supplier. Collect coordinates for the sites behind your critical parts, pull hazard indicators for each from Copernicus, the EEA or the national weather service, use an intermediate and a high emissions scenario, and convert each hazard into an operational number: downtime days, lead time extension, single-sourced share affected. Which suppliers should be screened first when you cannot screen all of them? Rank by replaceability, not by spend. Start with single-sourced inputs, then suppliers whose sites cluster in one region, then parts with long qualification times for an alternative. A first round of 20 to 30 suppliers chosen this way covers most of the exposure that can stop production. How often should a supplier climate exposure assessment be repeated? Not all of it at one interval. Review supplier sites and adaptation status yearly, concentration and single-source shares quarterly, and log every disruption against the modelled downtime. Hazard scores only need recalculating when the underlying dataset is updated, the scenario set only with a new IPCC cycle. Next step Turn climate risk or ESG data into a decision? In a 30-minute intro call we map where your biggest lever is, with no obligation. [Book an intro call](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/contact?hsLang=en) ![Johannes Fiegenbaum](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/Johannes_07-modified.png) ### Johannes Fiegenbaum ESG and sustainability consultant based in Hamburg, specialised in VSME reporting, carbon accounting and climate risk analysis. Works with mid-sized companies, investors and financial institutions, and developed the VSME reporting software VSEasy together with clients. [More about](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/about-me?hsLang=en) Related articles ## You may also like ### [Supply Chain & EUDR Which Platforms Monitor Biodiversity Risk in Supply Chains, and What Each Can Answer A supply chain biodiversity footprint is the pressure your purchased goods place on ecosystems at the places where they are grown, mined or processed. Almost all of it sits ... Read more →](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/identifying-reducing-biodiversity-risks-supply-chains?hsLang=en) ### [Carbon Accounting & Scope 3 Scope 3 Supply Chain Tracking: From Data Sources to a Workable Approach Read more →](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/ai-real-time-tracking-scope-3-emissions-supply-chains?hsLang=en) ### [Supply Chain & EUDR ESG Questionnaire Template: 20 Questions for Companies & Suppliers Read more →](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/the-ultimate-guide-to-esg-questionnaires-understanding-the-relevance-components-and-data-collection-for-companies?hsLang=en) ### [ESG Data & Metrics Unlocking Long-Term Value: How ESG Data Drives Business Success Beyond Compliance Read more →](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/unlocking-long-term-value-esg-data-business-success?hsLang=en) ### [Climate Risk Assessment Physical risks and transition risks: How to assess climate risks Read more →](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/physical-risks-and-transition-risks-how-to-assess-climate-risks?hsLang=en) ### [Carbon Accounting & Scope 3 Carbon Accounting Challenges for Startups: Where the Data Breaks and How to Fix It Read more →](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/startups-co2-accounting-challenges-solutions?hsLang=en) ##### Johannes Fiegenbaum Johannes Fiegenbaum I turn climate risk and ESG data into capital and financing decisions. For mid-market companies and investors, data-driven. From Hamburg, for companies across Europe. ##### Tools Tools - [Atlas](https://atlas.fiegenbaum.solutions/en) ##### Services Services - [Climate Risk Assessment](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/climate-risk-analysis-for-companies) - [VSME Reporting](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/vsme-reporting-for-smes) - [Company Carbon Footprint](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/company-carbon-footprint-methods-tools-best-practice) - [Double Materiality Assessment](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/double-materiality-analysis-definition-process-best-practice) ##### Fiegenbaum Solutions Fiegenbaum Solutions - [About me](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/about-me) - [Blog](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog) - [Contact](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/contact) [![1% for the Planet Business Member](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/1ftp_BusinessMember_Horizontal_FullColor-250x107-faa8874b-96e3-41e2-bbbe-9303832ac91c.png)](https://www.onepercentfortheplanet.org/) - [Legal Notice](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/legal-notice) - [Privacy Policy](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/privacy-policy) © 2026 Fiegenbaum Solutions ```json { "@context" : "https://schema.org", "@type" : "BlogPosting", "author" : { "@type" : "Person", "name" : "Johannes Fiegenbaum", "url" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/author/johannes-fiegenbaum" }, "dateModified" : "2025-07-29T09:26:55.840Z", "datePublished" : "2025-07-29T09:26:46.000Z", "headline" : "Supply Chain Climate Risk: Map, Measure and Monitor Supplier Exposure", "image" : [ "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/pexels-cluster-images/4759281.jpg" ], "mainEntityOfPage" : { "@id" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/identify-manage-hidden-climate-risks-supply-chain", "@type" : "WebPage" }, "publisher" : { "@type" : "Organization", "logo" : { "@type" : "ImageObject", "url" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/FS_Logo.svg" }, "name" : "Fiegenbaum & Cie. GmbH" } } ``` ```json { "@context" : "https://schema.org", "@id" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/#organization", "@type" : "Organization", "areaServed" : { "@type" : "Place", "name" : "European Union" }, "description" : "Nachhaltigkeitsberatung mit Fokus auf Klimarisikoanalyse, ESG-Reporting (CSRD, VSME) und Climate Tech Investmentberatung.", "employee" : { "@id" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/#founder" }, "founder" : { "@id" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/#founder" }, "image" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/Branding/Fiegenbaum-Solutions_Logo.svg", "knowsAbout" : [ "ESG Reporting", "CSRD Compliance", "VSME Standard", "Climate Risk Analysis", "EURO-CORDEX", "CMIP6", "Scope 3 Emissions", "Scenario Analysis", "Sustainability Strategy", "Climate Tech Investment" ], "logo" : { "@type" : "ImageObject", "url" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/Branding/Fiegenbaum-Solutions_Logo.svg" }, "name" : "Fiegenbaum Solutions", "sameAs" : [ "https://www.linkedin.com/in/johannesfiegenbaum/" ], "url" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions" } ``` ```json { "@context" : "https://schema.org", "@id" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/#founder", "@type" : "Person", "affiliation" : [ { "@type" : "Organization", "description" : "Climate tech angel syndicate (Venture Partner)", "name" : "Climate Insiders", "url" : "https://climateinsiders.com/" } ], "alumniOf" : { "@type" : "Organization", "name" : "Universität Tübingen", "url" : "https://uni-tuebingen.de/" }, "description" : "ESG consultant and climate tech investment advisor based in Hamburg. Specializing in VSME reporting, carbon accounting, and climate risk analysis for mid-sized companies, investors, and financial institutions.", "image" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/Johannes_07-modified.png", "jobTitle" : "ESG Consultant & Climate Tech Investment Advisor | CSRD, VSME & Climate Risk Specialist", "knowsAbout" : [ "CSRD", "VSME", "ESG Reporting", "Climate Risk Analysis", "EU Taxonomy", "TNFD", "Climate Tech Investment", "Sustainability Strategy", "Carbon Accounting", "Article 9 Funds" ], "name" : "Johannes Fiegenbaum", "publishingPrinciples" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/legal-notice#editorial", "sameAs" : [ "https://www.linkedin.com/in/johannesfiegenbaum/" ], "url" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/ueber-mich", "worksFor" : { "@id" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/#organization" } } ``` ```json { "@context" : "https://schema.org", "@id" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/#website", "@type" : "WebSite", "inLanguage" : [ "de-DE", "en-EU" ], "name" : "Fiegenbaum Solutions", "publisher" : { "@id" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/#organization" }, "url" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions" } ``` ```json { "@context" : "https://schema.org", "@type" : "FAQPage", "mainEntity" : [ { "@type" : "Question", "acceptedAnswer" : { "@type" : "Answer", "text" : "Measure per site, not per supplier. Collect coordinates for the sites behind your critical parts, pull hazard indicators for each from Copernicus, the EEA or the national weather service, use an intermediate and a high emissions scenario, and convert each hazard into an operational number: downtime days, lead time extension, single-sourced share affected." }, "name" : "How can supply chain managers measure climate risk to operations?" }, { "@type" : "Question", "acceptedAnswer" : { "@type" : "Answer", "text" : "Rank by replaceability, not by spend. Start with single-sourced inputs, then suppliers whose sites cluster in one region, then parts with long qualification times for an alternative. A first round of 20 to 30 suppliers chosen this way covers most of the exposure that can stop production." }, "name" : "Which suppliers should be screened first when you cannot screen all of them?" }, { "@type" : "Question", "acceptedAnswer" : { "@type" : "Answer", "text" : "Not all of it at one interval. Review supplier sites and adaptation status yearly, concentration and single-source shares quarterly, and log every disruption against the modelled downtime. Hazard scores only need recalculating when the underlying dataset is updated, the scenario set only with a new IPCC cycle." }, "name" : "How often should a supplier climate exposure assessment be repeated?" } ] } ```