How to Position Your (Climate) Tech Startup for Article 9 VC Funds

If you're building a climate tech startup in Europe, understanding Article 9 funds under the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) isn't optional—it's strategic. These impact funds represent the gold standard for sustainable investment in European financial markets. Unlike Article 8 funds that merely promote environmental or social characteristics, Article 9 funds must demonstrate that sustainable investment objectives form their primary purpose.

The distinction matters. Financial market participants classified as Article 9 must prove their investment strategy delivers measurable environmental or social objectives. For climate tech founders seeking capital from asset managers committed to sustainable finance, this regulatory framework shapes everything from due diligence to ongoing portfolio reporting.

Executive Summary: What Article 9 Funds Mean for Climate Tech

Article 9 funds represent the highest classification under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation SFDR. These financial products must align with specific sustainable investment objectives whilst ensuring portfolio companies follow good governance practices and avoid significant harm to environmental and social objectives.

For climate tech startups, positioning means building investor-grade documentation around carbon reduction, demonstrating EU taxonomy alignment, and establishing robust ESG governance from early stages. The investment process involves rigorous screening against sustainability risks, verification of positive impact, and ongoing monitoring of environmental or social characteristics promoted by portfolio companies.

Key takeaways:

Article 9 funds require demonstrable sustainable investment outcomes, not just sustainability characteristics
Asset managers must prove portfolio companies contribute to environmental or social objectives without causing significant harm
Investment decisions hinge on measurable impact metrics and alignment with reference benchmarks
Understanding the classification system helps founders target the right investment strategy

Understanding Article 9 Funds and the SFDR Framework

Article 9 funds, officially termed "financial products with sustainable investment as their objective," differ fundamentally from Article 8 funds (light green products promoting environmental or social characteristics) and conventional Article 6 products that don't integrate sustainability factors.

The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation SFDR established a three-tier classification system for financial market participants including asset managers and pension funds:

Article 6: Conventional investment funds disclosing sustainability risks
Article 8 (Light Green): Funds promoting environmental or social characteristics alongside financial returns
Article 9 (Dark Green): Impact funds where sustainable investment objectives form the core purpose

Core Requirements for Article 9 Classification

Financial market participants seeking Article 9 classification must demonstrate their financial product promotes environmental or social objectives as primary purpose. The SFDR requires asset managers to prove:

Sustainable Investment Objectives: The fund invests exclusively in sustainable investments
Do No Significant Harm (DNSH): Portfolio companies avoid significant harm to other environmental or social objectives
Good Governance Practices: Investee companies follow good governance practices
Principal Adverse Impact: Report on negative impacts of investment decisions
Reference Benchmark Alignment: Demonstrate how designated index aligned with sustainable investment

How Many Article 9 Funds Operate in Europe?

Approximately 2,800 financial products carry Article 9 classification across European markets, managing assets exceeding €450 billion. However, this number has fluctuated significantly, with many management companies reclassifying from Article 9 to Article 8 due to increased scrutiny from the European Securities and Markets Authority.

The climate tech sector has seen particular growth in Article 9 funds, with Climentum Capital, Planet A Ventures, and Seaya Andromeda leading early-stage sustainable investment in decarbonisation technologies.

Article 9 vs Article 8: Understanding Critical Differences

Article 8 funds promote environmental or social characteristics alongside financial returns but don't require sustainability as primary investment objective. Article 9 funds must demonstrate that sustainable investment objectives form the core purpose, requiring measurable positive environmental or social outcomes.

For climate tech startups, this means Article 9 funds conduct deeper due diligence on impact metrics, require more robust carbon accounting, and maintain stricter monitoring of environmental and social objectives throughout the investment period.

The Do No Significant Harm Principle

Both Article 8 and Article 9 funds must consider DNSH, but Article 9 funds face stricter requirements across all environmental and social objectives. The DNSH assessment covers climate change mitigation and adaptation, water resources, circular economy, pollution prevention, and biodiversity protection.

Financial market participants managing Article 9 funds must document how each portfolio company addresses potential negative impacts across these dimensions, creating substantially more compliance requirements than Article 8 products face.

Disclosure Requirements Under SFDR

The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation SFDR mandates different pre-contractual disclosures for Article 8 and Article 9 products. Asset managers offering Article 9 funds must provide detailed explanation of how sustainable investment objectives are achieved, methodology for assessing positive impact, and reporting on principal adverse impact indicators at fund level.

The 7/5/3-1 Rule in Mutual Funds

The 7/5/3-1 rule represents diversification principles limiting concentration risk in investment products. For Article 9 funds investing in climate tech, similar portfolio construction guidelines apply, typically holding 20-40 companies at full deployment to balance impact potential with financial risk management.

Quantifying Impact for Sustainable Investment

Financial market participants managing Article 9 funds require portfolio companies to demonstrate measurable contributions to environmental or social objectives. For climate tech startups, this means building robust impact quantification frameworks.

Avoided Emissions as Core Metric

Most climate-focused Article 9 funds structure their investment process around avoided emissions—greenhouse gas reductions achieved compared to business-as-usual scenarios. Calculating avoided emissions requires:

Baseline Definition: Specify incumbent technology your solution replaces
System Boundaries: Document which emissions sources are included
Data Sources: Reference credible emissions factors from databases
Scale Projections: Model how avoided emissions grow with deployment
Additionality: Prove reductions wouldn't occur without your technology

Asset managers increasingly reference frameworks like Project FRAME to standardise impact assessment. Understanding these methodologies helps founders present impact cases aligning with how financial market participants evaluate environmental objectives.

Our guide on measuring startup impact through lifecycle assessment provides detailed frameworks for impact quantification.

Beyond Carbon: Multi-Dimensional Impact

Comprehensive sustainable investment requires addressing multiple environmental and social characteristics. The SFDR framework recognises six environmental objectives under EU Taxonomy, each requiring specific metrics for climate adaptation, water resources, circular economy, pollution prevention, and biodiversity protection.

Financial products pursuing Article 9 classification must demonstrate portfolio contribution to at least one primary environmental objective whilst avoiding significant harm to others.

Demonstrating Do No Significant Harm Compliance

The DNSH principle represents non-negotiable requirements for Article 9 funds. Financial market participants must prove that whilst pursuing specific sustainable investment objectives, their financial products don't cause significant harm to other environmental or social objectives.

Practical DNSH Assessment

Implementing DNSH doesn't require perfection. The investment strategy of leading Article 9 funds recognises sustainability risks evolve as companies scale:

Seed Stage DNSH:

Complete ESG questionnaire identifying potential harm
Document material sourcing and supplier selection
Establish exclusion policy for high-risk materials

Series A DNSH:

Conduct systematic DNSH assessment following EU Taxonomy criteria
Implement supplier auditing for environmental and social characteristics
Establish KPIs tracking harm reduction

Asset managers appreciate founders treating DNSH as business model innovation opportunity. Our resource on ESG questionnaires and data collection provides frameworks for systematic assessment.

EU Taxonomy Alignment for Article 9 Funds

Whilst EU Taxonomy and Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation SFDR are distinct instruments, they increasingly converge for Article 9 funds. Financial market participants often guide portfolio companies towards Taxonomy alignment as evidence of contribution to environmental objectives.

Understanding Technical Screening Criteria

EU Taxonomy defines "environmentally sustainable activities" through technical screening criteria. Each eligible activity must meet substantial contribution thresholds, DNSH criteria across six environmental objectives, and minimum social safeguards.

Financial products pursuing Article 9 classification increasingly reference Taxonomy criteria even when formal reporting isn't required, using the framework for impact assessment.

Strategic Taxonomy Approach

Full Taxonomy alignment requires detailed documentation often unavailable to pre-commercial startups. Rather than viewing this as barrier, founders should treat Taxonomy as roadmap. Asset managers managing Article 9 funds appreciate founders demonstrating Taxonomy literacy and strategic intent towards alignment.

For detailed guidance, review our EU Taxonomy guide for startups and green financing.

Building Governance for Good Governance Practices

Good governance practices represent mandatory components of sustainable investment definition under SFDR. Financial market participants assess governance structures with attention to how sustainability risks are managed at board level.

ESG Governance Requirements

Article 9 funds expect portfolio companies to demonstrate governance capabilities supporting delivery of environmental or social objectives. The investment process evaluates board oversight, ESG integration into decisions, stakeholder engagement, transparency mechanisms, and compensation alignment.

Early-stage startups needn't implement corporate-scale governance immediately, but asset managers expect founder commitment to building appropriate structures as companies scale.

Practical Governance Frameworks

Seed Stage:

Designate founder responsible for ESG and impact reporting
Document environmental and social objectives in founding materials
Establish basic exclusions policy avoiding thermal coal producers
Create simple impact measurement framework

Series A:

Formalise ESG committee with external expertise
Implement systematic sustainability risk assessment
Develop comprehensive impact measurement system
Establish whistleblower protection mechanisms

Financial products focused on sustainable development appreciate governance structures embedding sustainability into company culture. Our guide on implementing ESG criteria provides actionable frameworks.

Creating Investor-Grade Documentation

The investment process for Article 9 funds involves extensive due diligence on impact claims and measurement methodologies. Creating documentation that accelerates this process separates fundable companies from those struggling to articulate value to sustainable finance investors.

Essential Documentation

Financial market participants conducting sustainable investment due diligence typically request:

Impact Thesis: Clear articulation of environmental or social problem addressed
Impact Measurement Framework: Definition of core metrics aligned with recognised standards
DNSH Assessment: Systematic evaluation across six environmental objectives
ESG Management System: Organisational structure for ESG oversight
Taxonomy Analysis: Mapping of activities to Taxonomy categories

Asset managers appreciate founders who proactively prepare comprehensive documentation rather than scrambling during due diligence.

Leveraging External Validation

Third-party verification strengthens impact documentation. Relevant validations include lifecycle assessment certification following ISO standards, B Corp certification, Science-Based Targets alignment, and industry-specific certifications.

Financial products increasingly reference external validations in pre-contractual disclosures to demonstrate robustness of portfolio impact claims. For comprehensive guidance, see our analysis of third-party ESG audits and verification.

Understanding SFDR 2.0: Preparing for Regulatory Evolution

Recent leaked proposals for fundamental SFDR reform—dubbed "SFDR 2.0"—signal potential transformation of sustainable finance frameworks affecting how financial market participants classify products and report on sustainable investment objectives.

Proposed Changes to Classification

Leaked European Commission proposals suggest replacing current Article 6/8/9 categorisation with three new product labels: Sustainability-Focused Products (replacing Article 9), Sustainability-Improving Products, and Transition Products. The new classification system would include standardised product names, clearer exclusion criteria including thermal coal producers, and specific quantitative thresholds for environmental and social characteristics.

Simplification of Disclosure Requirements

SFDR 2.0 proposals suggest substantial streamlining. Principal adverse impact reporting at entity and product level would be removed, website disclosure requirements consolidated, and pre-contractual disclosures streamlined. Financial products serving only professional investors might opt out of certain requirements entirely.

Strategic Response for Founders

Given regulatory uncertainty, climate tech founders should focus on building capabilities transcending specific requirements: robust impact measurement, authentic governance, DNSH discipline, and genuine focus on environmental or social objectives. The investment strategy of sophisticated financial market participants looks beyond regulatory categories to assess genuine sustainability performance.

For broader context, review our analysis of EU Omnibus Package simplifications.

Conclusion: Building Investment-Ready Climate Tech

Positioning for Article 9 funds requires building authentic capabilities for measuring environmental or social objectives, managing sustainability risks, and demonstrating positive impact at scale. Financial market participants managing impact funds conduct rigorous due diligence because their credibility depends on portfolio quality.

The investment process favours founders embracing sustainability as strategic advantage rather than compliance burden. Companies embedding impact measurement into product development, treating DNSH as design principle, and building transparent governance structures build more resilient, valuable businesses.

As the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation SFDR evolves, fundamentals remain constant: asset managers pursuing sustainable investment need portfolio companies delivering verifiable positive impact without significant harm. Founders building these capabilities remain attractive to sustainable finance capital regardless of regulatory specifics.

The European Union's sustainable finance agenda continues expanding, with Article 9 funds representing the vanguard of capital allocation aligned with climate and social objectives. For climate tech solving defining challenges, learning to speak the language of sustainable investment whilst building genuine impact unlocks access to capital committed to environmental and social objectives alongside financial returns.

Need strategic guidance on positioning for Article 9 investment?

Navigating SFDR requirements whilst building authentic sustainability capabilities requires technical expertise and strategic perspective. I help climate tech founders develop investor-grade impact documentation, implement governance satisfying Article 9 due diligence, and build measurement frameworks demonstrating genuine contribution to environmental or social objectives.

Schedule a consultation to discuss how your startup can become investment-ready for the growing pool of Article 9 capital seeking genuine climate solutions.

Frequently Asked Questions: Article 9 Funds and Sustainable Investment

What defines an Article 9 fund under SFDR?

Article 9 funds are financial products with sustainable investment as their objective under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation SFDR. These impact funds must demonstrate that environmental or social objectives form their primary investment purpose. Financial market participants offering Article 9 products face strictest disclosure requirements and must prove portfolio companies contribute to sustainable development whilst following good governance practices and avoiding significant harm to other sustainability objectives.

How do Article 9 funds differ from Article 8 sustainable funds?

The fundamental distinction lies in investment objectives. Article 8 funds promote environmental or social characteristics but don't require sustainability as primary objective—financial returns remain dominant with ESG integration supporting investment strategy. Article 9 funds must demonstrate that sustainable investment objectives form the core purpose, requiring portfolio companies to deliver measurable positive impact on environmental or social objectives. The investment process, disclosure requirements, and verification standards differ substantially, with Article 9 representing significantly higher bar for sustainable finance classification.

What are the top Article 9 funds for climate tech startups?

Leading Article 9 funds investing in climate tech include Climentum Capital (focusing on avoided emissions at scale), Planet A Ventures (broad climate tech mandate), and Seaya Andromeda (growth-stage Southern Europe climate). Evaluation criteria should include impact measurement frameworks, sector expertise, portfolio support beyond capital, alignment between fund's sustainable investment objectives and your technology's environmental objectives, and network effects. Asset managers with strong relationships to corporate partners provide most strategic value. These impact funds typically operate in European markets targeting companies with demonstrable contribution to environmental or social characteristics.

How many Article 9 funds currently operate in Europe?

Approximately 2,800 financial products carry Article 9 classification across European markets as of 2024, managing combined assets exceeding €450 billion. However, this number has experienced significant volatility since SFDR implementation, with numerous management companies reclassifying products from Article 9 to Article 8 following regulatory scrutiny. The climate tech subset represents smaller but growing portion, with dozens of dedicated impact funds targeting early-stage climate solutions. Fund flows data shows that whilst overall Article 9 assets experienced temporary reduction during 2023-2024, highest-quality sustainable investment products maintained investor confidence through transparent reporting on environmental and social objectives.

What is the 7/5/3-1 rule for mutual funds?

The 7/5/3-1 rule represents diversification principles in US mutual fund regulation requiring that 75% of fund assets be diversified such that no more than 5% is invested in securities of any single issuer. For Article 9 funds operating under European regulation, similar concentration limits apply through UCITS regulations. Impact funds investing in climate tech typically hold 20-40 portfolio companies at full deployment, balancing concentration sufficient for meaningful environmental or social objectives with diversification required for risk management. This approach helps financial market participants maintain broad market index comparisons whilst focusing on sustainable investment outcomes.

What criteria must companies meet to attract Article 9 investment?

Financial market participants managing Article 9 funds evaluate potential portfolio companies across multiple dimensions: demonstrated contribution to specific environmental or social objectives through quantified impact metrics; evidence of avoiding significant harm across all six EU Taxonomy environmental objectives; good governance practices including board-level sustainability oversight and transparent reporting; scalability with potential for meaningful emissions reduction (typically 100,000+ tonnes CO₂e avoided); alignment or clear path towards EU Taxonomy technical screening criteria; robust impact measurement using recognised frameworks. The investment strategy favours founders treating requirements as strategic opportunities rather than compliance burdens, demonstrating genuine commitment to sustainable investment objectives alongside business viability.

How should founders prepare for potential SFDR 2.0 changes?

Rather than optimising for specific SFDR articles that may change, founders should focus on building authentic capabilities: robust impact measurement using recognised frameworks demonstrating contribution to environmental or social objectives; genuine governance structures embedding sustainability into company culture; systematic DNSH assessment strengthening business resilience; transparent reporting on both positive impacts and challenges; alignment with established sustainable finance principles including additionality and accountability. Investment decisions by leading financial market participants increasingly look beyond regulatory categories to assess substantive sustainability performance, suggesting founders with authentic impact capabilities remain attractive regardless of classification system evolution under proposed changes to the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation.

What documentation do Article 9 funds require during due diligence?

Financial products pursuing sustainable investment objectives conduct extensive due diligence requiring comprehensive documentation: detailed impact thesis explaining how technology delivers environmental or social objectives; quantified impact metrics with transparent methodology; DNSH assessment addressing all six environmental objectives; ESG governance structures including policies and oversight mechanisms; financial projections integrated with impact scaling models; supply chain sustainability analysis; EU Taxonomy alignment assessment or roadmap; stakeholder engagement evidence; risk assessment covering financial and sustainability dimensions. Asset managers appreciate founders who proactively prepare documentation demonstrating sophisticated understanding of sustainable finance requirements rather than treating sustainability as compliance afterthought, particularly regarding good governance practices and reference benchmark alignment expectations.

Further Resources on Sustainable Investment

Johannes Fiegenbaum

ESG & sustainability consultant specializing in CSRD, VSME, and climate risk analysis. 300+ projects for companies like Commerzbank, UBS, and Allianz.

More about

14 min read