---
title: How to Position Your (Climate) Tech Startup for Article 9 VC Funds
description: "Position your climate tech startup for Article 9 SFDR funds: expert tips on impact metrics, DNSH compliance, and investor-grade ESG documentation."
image: https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/tom-parkes-Ns-BIiW_cNU-unsplash%20%281%29.jpg
---

[Skip to content](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/how-to-position-your-climate-tech-startup-for-article-9-vc-funds#main-content)

[![Fiegenbaum Solutions Logo](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/Branding/Fiegenbaum-Solutions_Logo.svg) ![Fiegenbaum Solutions Logo](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/Branding/Fiegenbaum-Solutions_Logo.svg)](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/?hsLang=en)

- [English](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/how-to-position-your-climate-tech-startup-for-article-9-vc-funds)
- [Deutsch](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/blog/wie-sie-ihr-klima-tech-startup-für-artikel-9-vc-fonds-positionieren)

- Services 
    - [Climate Risk Assessment](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/climate-risk-analysis-for-companies)
    - [VSME Report](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/vsme-reporting-for-smes)
    - [ESG Due Diligence VCs & Series A+](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/esg-due-diligence-vcs-series-a-startups)
    - [Product Carbon Footprint](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/product-carbon-footprint-lifecycle-assessment)
    - [Corporate Carbon Footprint](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/company-carbon-footprint-methods-tools-best-practice)
- Solutions 
    - [Materiality Screening](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/double-materiality-analysis-definition-process-best-practice#fs-screening)
    - [Atlas](https://atlas.fiegenbaum.solutions/en)
    - [Load Profile Check](https://atlas.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/lastgang-check)
- [Pricing](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/esg-climate-consulting-fixed-prices-carbon-footprint-vsme-due-diligence-climate-risk)
- [About me](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/about-me)
- [Blog](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog)
- [Contact](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/contact)

###### 18 min read

# How to Position Your (Climate) Tech Startup for Article 9 VC Funds

By: [Johannes Fiegenbaum](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/author/johannes-fiegenbaum) on  4/2/25, 3:29 PM  · Last updated October 11, 2026

[EU Taxonomy](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/tag/eu-taxonomy) [Climate VC & Impact Investing](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/tag/climate-vc-impact-investing)

![Two people walking through a tunnel lit in blue](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/tom-parkes-Ns-BIiW_cNU-unsplash%20%281%29.jpg)

If you're building a [climate tech startup in Europe](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/climatetech-2025-german-startups-co2-eu-compliance?hsLang=en), understanding Article 9 funds under the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) isn't optional, it's strategic. These impact funds represent the gold standard for sustainable investment in European financial markets. Unlike Article 8 funds that merely promote environmental or social characteristics, Article 9 funds must demonstrate that sustainable investment objectives form their primary purpose.

The distinction matters. Financial market participants classified as Article 9 must prove their investment strategy delivers measurable environmental or social objectives. For climate tech founders seeking capital from asset managers committed to sustainable finance, this regulatory framework shapes everything from due diligence to ongoing portfolio reporting.

**Table of Contents**

1. [What Article 9 Funds Mean for Climate Tech](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/how-to-position-your-climate-tech-startup-for-article-9-vc-funds#executive-summary-what-article-9-funds-mean-for-climate-tech)
2. [Understanding Article 9 Funds and the SFDR Framework](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/how-to-position-your-climate-tech-startup-for-article-9-vc-funds#understanding-article-9-funds-and-the-sfdr-framework)
3. [Article 9 vs Article 8: Understanding Critical Differences](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/how-to-position-your-climate-tech-startup-for-article-9-vc-funds#article-9-vs-article-8-understanding-critical-differences)
4. [Top Article 9 Funds Investing in Climate Tech](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/how-to-position-your-climate-tech-startup-for-article-9-vc-funds#top-article-9-funds-investing-in-climate-tech)
5. [Quantifying Impact for Sustainable Investment](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/how-to-position-your-climate-tech-startup-for-article-9-vc-funds#quantifying-impact-for-sustainable-investment)
6. [Understanding SFDR 2.0: Preparing for Regulatory Evolution](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/how-to-position-your-climate-tech-startup-for-article-9-vc-funds#understanding-sfdr-20-preparing-for-regulatory-evolution)
7. [Conclusion: Building Investment-Ready Climate Tech](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/how-to-position-your-climate-tech-startup-for-article-9-vc-funds#conclusion-building-investment-ready-climate-tech)
8. [Frequently Asked Questions: Article 9 Funds and Sustainable Investment](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/how-to-position-your-climate-tech-startup-for-article-9-vc-funds#frequently-asked-questions-article-9-funds-and-sustainable-i)

## What Article 9 Funds Mean for Climate Tech

**Focus of this article:** This article is written for climate tech founders raising from Article 9 VC funds, what you need before pitching. For the overall VC ESG overview, SFDR 2.0, LP expectations, due diligence, SBTi and metrics, see my [VC ESG Complete Guide 2026](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/esg-venture-capital?hsLang=en).

Article 9 funds represent the highest classification under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation SFDR. These financial products must align with specific sustainable investment objectives whilst ensuring portfolio companies follow good governance practices and avoid significant harm to environmental and social objectives.

For climate tech startups, positioning means building investor-grade documentation around carbon reduction, demonstrating EU taxonomy alignment, and establishing robust ESG governance from early stages. The investment process involves rigorous screening against sustainability risks, verification of positive impact, and ongoing monitoring of environmental or social characteristics promoted by portfolio companies.

- Article 9 funds require demonstrable sustainable investment outcomes, not just sustainability characteristics
- Asset managers must prove portfolio companies contribute to environmental or social objectives without causing significant harm
- Investment decisions hinge on measurable impact metrics and alignment with reference benchmarks
- Understanding the classification system helps founders target the right investment strategy

## Understanding Article 9 Funds and the SFDR Framework

Article 9 funds, officially termed "financial products with sustainable investment as their objective," differ fundamentally from Article 8 funds (light green products promoting environmental or social characteristics) and conventional Article 6 products that don't integrate sustainability factors.

The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation SFDR established a three-tier classification system for financial market participants including asset managers and pension funds:

- **Article 6:** Conventional investment funds disclosing sustainability risks
- **Article 8 (Light Green):** Funds promoting environmental or social characteristics alongside financial returns
- **Article 9 (Dark Green):** Impact funds where sustainable investment objectives form the core purpose

### Core Requirements for Article 9 Classification

Financial market participants seeking Article 9 classification must demonstrate their financial product promotes environmental or social objectives as primary purpose. The SFDR requires asset managers to prove:

1. **Sustainable Investment Objectives:** The fund invests exclusively in sustainable investments
2. **Do No Significant Harm (DNSH):** Portfolio companies avoid significant harm to other environmental or social objectives
3. **Good Governance Practices:** Investee companies follow good governance practices
4. **Principal Adverse Impact:** Report on negative impacts of investment decisions
5. **Reference Benchmark Alignment:** Demonstrate how designated index aligned with sustainable investment

### How Many Article 9 Funds Operate in Europe?

The number of Article 9 products has fluctuated significantly, with many management companies reclassifying from Article 9 to Article 8 due to increased scrutiny from the European Securities and Markets Authority.

The climate tech sector has seen particular growth in Article 9 funds, with Climentum Capital, Planet A Ventures, and Seaya Andromeda leading early-stage sustainable investment in decarbonisation technologies.

## Article 9 vs Article 8: Understanding Critical Differences

Article 8 funds promote environmental or social characteristics alongside financial returns but don't require sustainability as primary investment objective. Article 9 funds must demonstrate that sustainable investment objectives form the core purpose, requiring measurable positive environmental or social outcomes.

For climate tech startups, this means Article 9 funds conduct deeper due diligence on impact metrics, require more robust carbon accounting, and maintain stricter monitoring of environmental and social objectives throughout the investment period.

### The Do No Significant Harm Principle

Article 9 funds must apply DNSH to every sustainable investment they hold, Article 8 funds only to the share they report as sustainable investments. Under SFDR the test runs on the principal adverse impact indicators, such as greenhouse gas emissions, activities in biodiversity-sensitive areas, emissions to water, hazardous waste and violations of the UN Global Compact principles. Where a fund also reports Taxonomy alignment, the Taxonomy DNSH criteria add checks on climate change [mitigation and adaptation](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/mitigation-vs-adaptation-climate-investment-strategies?hsLang=en), water resources, circular economy, pollution prevention, and biodiversity protection.

Financial market participants managing Article 9 funds must document how each portfolio company addresses potential negative impacts across these dimensions, creating substantially more compliance requirements than Article 8 products face.

### Disclosure Requirements Under SFDR

The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation SFDR mandates different pre-contractual disclosures for Article 8 and Article 9 products. Asset managers offering Article 9 funds must provide detailed explanation of how sustainable investment objectives are achieved, methodology for assessing positive impact, and reporting on principal adverse impact indicators at fund level.

### The 7/5/3-1 Rule in Mutual Funds

The 7/5/3-1 rule is a rule of thumb for retail fund savings plans and has no regulatory weight for venture funds. Article 9 venture funds set their own concentration limits.

## Top Article 9 Funds Investing in Climate Tech

Understanding leading financial market participants in Article 9 climate investing helps founders identify investors whose investment strategy aligns with deep sustainability objectives.

### Leading European Climate Tech Impact Funds

**Climentum Capital** operates an Article 9 fund targeting climate tech startups with potential to avoid over 100,000 tonnes CO₂e by 2032. Their investment process requires portfolio companies deliver at least 50% lower carbon emissions compared to incumbents.

**Planet A Ventures** focuses on companies delivering substantial environmental benefits through technology innovation. Their investment strategy prioritises sustainable food systems, circular economy solutions, and clean energy infrastructure.

**Seaya Andromeda** launched as Southern Europe's first Article 9 climate tech fund at €300 million, targeting growth-stage companies with proven climate impact.

### What Makes the Best Article 9 Funds?

Evaluating the best financial products in Article 9 requires considering multiple dimensions beyond financial returns. For climate tech founders, optimal sustainable investment partners demonstrate:

- **Impact Measurement Rigour:** Clear methodologies for environmental or social objectives with transparent reporting
- **Portfolio Support:** Strategic guidance on SFDR compliance and scaling climate technologies
- **Sector Expertise:** Deep domain knowledge in specific climate sectors
- **Network Effects:** Portfolio synergies and commercial partnerships

Recent data on fund flows shows Article 9 funds experienced temporary outflows during 2023-2024 as regulatory scrutiny increased, but highest-quality impact investing strategies maintained investor confidence.

For comprehensive ESG positioning guidance, explore our [guide to unlocking ESG value for startups and venture capital](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/esg-venture-capital?hsLang=en).

## Quantifying Impact for Sustainable Investment

Financial market participants managing Article 9 funds require portfolio companies to demonstrate measurable contributions to environmental or social objectives. For climate tech startups, this means building robust impact quantification frameworks.

### Avoided Emissions as Core Metric

Most climate-focused Article 9 funds structure their investment process around avoided emissions, greenhouse gas reductions achieved compared to business-as-usual scenarios. Calculating avoided emissions requires:

- **Baseline Definition:** Specify incumbent technology your solution replaces
- **System Boundaries:** Document which emissions sources are included
- **Data Sources:** Reference credible emissions factors from databases
- **Scale Projections:** Model how avoided emissions grow with deployment
- **Additionality:** Prove reductions wouldn't occur without your technology

Asset managers increasingly reference frameworks like Project FRAME to standardise impact assessment. Understanding these methodologies helps founders present impact cases aligning with how financial market participants evaluate environmental objectives.

Our guide on [measuring startup impact through lifecycle assessment](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/lca-vs-pcf-environmental-assessment-guide?hsLang=en) provides detailed frameworks for impact quantification.

### Beyond Carbon: Multi-Dimensional Impact

Comprehensive sustainable investment requires addressing multiple environmental and social characteristics. A common reference is the six environmental objectives of the [EU Taxonomy](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/eu-taxonomy-checklist-for-companies?hsLang=en), each requiring specific metrics for climate adaptation, water resources, circular economy, pollution prevention, and biodiversity protection.

Financial products pursuing Article 9 classification must demonstrate portfolio contribution to at least one primary environmental objective whilst avoiding significant harm to others.

### Demonstrating Do No Significant Harm Compliance

The DNSH principle represents non-negotiable requirements for Article 9 funds. Financial market participants must prove that whilst pursuing specific sustainable investment objectives, their financial products don't cause significant harm to other environmental or social objectives.

### Practical DNSH Assessment

Implementing DNSH doesn't require perfection. The investment strategy of leading Article 9 funds recognises sustainability risks evolve as companies scale:

**Seed Stage DNSH:**

- Complete ESG questionnaire identifying potential harm
- Document material sourcing and supplier selection
- Establish exclusion policy for high-risk materials

**Series A DNSH:**

- Conduct systematic DNSH assessment following EU Taxonomy criteria
- Implement supplier auditing for environmental and social characteristics
- Establish KPIs tracking harm reduction

Asset managers appreciate founders treating DNSH as business model innovation opportunity. Our resource on [ESG questionnaires and data collection](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/the-ultimate-guide-to-esg-questionnaires-understanding-the-relevance-components-and-data-collection-for-companies?hsLang=en) provides frameworks for systematic assessment.

### EU Taxonomy Alignment for Article 9 Funds

Whilst EU Taxonomy and Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation SFDR are distinct instruments, they increasingly converge for Article 9 funds. Financial market participants often guide portfolio companies towards Taxonomy alignment as evidence of contribution to environmental objectives.

### Understanding Technical Screening Criteria

EU Taxonomy defines "environmentally sustainable activities" through technical screening criteria. Each eligible activity must meet substantial contribution thresholds, DNSH criteria across six environmental objectives, and minimum social safeguards.

Financial products pursuing Article 9 classification increasingly reference Taxonomy criteria even when formal reporting isn't required, using the framework for impact assessment.

### Strategic Taxonomy Approach

Full Taxonomy alignment requires detailed documentation often unavailable to pre-commercial startups. Rather than viewing this as barrier, founders should treat Taxonomy as roadmap. Asset managers managing Article 9 funds appreciate founders demonstrating Taxonomy literacy and strategic intent towards alignment.

For detailed guidance, review our [EU Taxonomy guide for startups and green financing](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/eu-taxonomy-startups-sustainable-growth-green-financing?hsLang=en).

### Building Governance for Good Governance Practices

Good governance practices represent mandatory components of sustainable investment definition under SFDR. Financial market participants assess governance structures with attention to how sustainability risks are managed at board level.

### ESG Governance Requirements

Article 9 funds expect portfolio companies to demonstrate governance capabilities supporting delivery of environmental or social objectives. The investment process evaluates board oversight, ESG integration into decisions, stakeholder engagement, transparency mechanisms, and compensation alignment.

Early-stage startups needn't implement corporate-scale governance immediately, but asset managers expect founder commitment to building appropriate structures as companies scale.

### Practical Governance Frameworks

**Seed Stage:**

- Designate founder responsible for ESG and impact reporting
- Document environmental and social objectives in founding materials
- Establish basic exclusions policy avoiding thermal coal producers
- Create simple impact measurement framework

**Series A:**

- Formalise ESG committee with external expertise
- Implement systematic sustainability risk assessment
- Develop comprehensive impact measurement system
- Establish whistleblower protection mechanisms

Financial products focused on sustainable development appreciate governance structures embedding sustainability into company culture. Our guide on implementing ESG criteria provides actionable frameworks.

### Creating Investor-Grade Documentation

The investment process for Article 9 funds involves extensive due diligence on impact claims and measurement methodologies. Creating documentation that accelerates this process separates fundable companies from those struggling to articulate value to sustainable finance investors.

### Essential Documentation

Financial market participants conducting sustainable investment due diligence typically request:

- **Impact Thesis:** Clear articulation of environmental or social problem addressed
- **Impact Measurement Framework:** Definition of core metrics aligned with recognised standards
- **DNSH Assessment:** Systematic evaluation against the principal adverse impact indicators
- **ESG Management System:** Organisational structure for ESG oversight
- **Taxonomy Analysis:** Mapping of activities to Taxonomy categories

Asset managers appreciate founders who proactively prepare comprehensive documentation rather than scrambling during due diligence.

### Leveraging External Validation

Third-party verification strengthens impact documentation. Relevant validations include lifecycle assessment certification following ISO standards, B Corp certification, Science-Based Targets alignment, and industry-specific certifications.

Financial products increasingly reference external validations in pre-contractual disclosures to demonstrate robustness of portfolio impact claims. For comprehensive guidance, see our analysis of [third-party ESG audits and verification](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/third-party-esg-audits-guide?hsLang=en).

## Understanding SFDR 2.0: Preparing for Regulatory Evolution

The Commission's proposal of 20 November 2025 for a fundamental SFDR reform, dubbed "SFDR 2.0", signals potential transformation of sustainable finance frameworks affecting how financial market participants classify products and report on sustainable investment objectives.

### Proposed Changes to Classification

The proposal would replace the current Article 8 and 9 categories with three product categories: Sustainable (Article 9), Transition (Article 7) and ESG Basics (Article 8). Parliament and Council are still negotiating it. The new classification system would include standardised product names, clearer exclusion criteria including thermal coal producers, and specific quantitative thresholds for environmental and social characteristics.

### Simplification of Disclosure Requirements

SFDR 2.0 proposals suggest substantial streamlining. The entity-level principal adverse impact statement would be removed, while products in the new sustainable and transition categories would still identify and disclose principal adverse impacts; website disclosure requirements consolidated, and pre-contractual disclosures streamlined. Financial products serving only professional investors might opt out of certain requirements entirely.

### Strategic Response for Founders

Given regulatory uncertainty, climate tech founders should focus on building capabilities transcending specific requirements: robust impact measurement, authentic governance, DNSH discipline, and genuine focus on environmental or social objectives. The investment strategy of sophisticated financial market participants looks beyond regulatory categories to assess genuine sustainability performance.

For broader context, review our analysis of [EU Omnibus Package simplifications](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/eu-omnibus-package-2025-simplifying-csrd-reporting?hsLang=en).

## Conclusion: Building Investment-Ready Climate Tech

Positioning for Article 9 funds requires building authentic capabilities for measuring environmental or social objectives, managing sustainability risks, and demonstrating positive impact at scale. Financial market participants managing impact funds conduct rigorous due diligence because their credibility depends on portfolio quality.

The investment process favours founders embracing sustainability as strategic advantage rather than compliance burden. Companies embedding impact measurement into product development, treating DNSH as design principle, and building transparent governance structures build more resilient, valuable businesses.

As the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation SFDR evolves, fundamentals remain constant: asset managers pursuing sustainable investment need portfolio companies delivering verifiable positive impact without significant harm. Founders building these capabilities remain attractive to sustainable finance capital regardless of regulatory specifics.

The European Union's sustainable finance agenda continues expanding, with Article 9 funds representing the vanguard of capital allocation aligned with climate and social objectives. For climate tech solving defining challenges, learning to speak the language of sustainable investment whilst building genuine impact unlocks access to capital committed to environmental and social objectives alongside financial returns.

**Need strategic guidance on positioning for Article 9 investment?**

Navigating SFDR requirements whilst building authentic sustainability capabilities requires technical expertise and strategic perspective. I help climate tech founders develop investor-grade impact documentation, implement governance satisfying Article 9 due diligence, and build measurement frameworks demonstrating genuine contribution to environmental or social objectives.

[Schedule a consultation](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/contact?hsLang=en) to discuss how your startup can become investment-ready for the growing pool of Article 9 capital seeking genuine climate solutions.

## Frequently Asked Questions: Article 9 Funds and Sustainable Investment

1\. What defines an Article 9 fund under SFDR?

Article 9 funds are financial products with sustainable investment as their objective under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation SFDR. These impact funds must demonstrate that environmental or social objectives form their primary investment purpose. Financial market participants offering Article 9 products face strictest disclosure requirements and must prove portfolio companies contribute to sustainable development whilst following good governance practices and avoiding significant harm to other sustainability objectives.

2\. How do Article 9 funds differ from Article 8 sustainable funds?

The fundamental distinction lies in investment objectives. Article 8 funds promote environmental or social characteristics but don't require sustainability as primary objective, financial returns remain dominant with ESG integration supporting investment strategy. Article 9 funds must demonstrate that sustainable investment objectives form the core purpose, requiring portfolio companies to deliver measurable positive impact on environmental or social objectives. The investment process, disclosure requirements, and verification standards differ substantially, with Article 9 representing significantly higher bar for sustainable finance classification.

3\. What are the top Article 9 funds for climate tech startups?

Leading Article 9 funds investing in climate tech include Climentum Capital (focusing on avoided emissions at scale), Planet A Ventures (broad climate tech mandate), and Seaya Andromeda (growth-stage Southern Europe climate). Evaluation criteria should include impact measurement frameworks, sector expertise, portfolio support beyond capital, alignment between fund's sustainable investment objectives and your technology's environmental objectives, and network effects. Asset managers with strong relationships to corporate partners provide most strategic value. These impact funds typically operate in European markets targeting companies with demonstrable contribution to environmental or social characteristics.

4\. How many Article 9 funds currently operate in Europe?

There is no single official count. The number of Article 9 products has experienced significant volatility since SFDR implementation, with numerous management companies reclassifying products from Article 9 to Article 8 following regulatory scrutiny. The climate tech subset represents smaller but growing portion, with dozens of dedicated impact funds targeting early-stage climate solutions. Fund flows data shows that whilst overall Article 9 assets experienced temporary reduction during 2023-2024, highest-quality sustainable investment products maintained investor confidence through transparent reporting on environmental and social objectives.

5\. What is the 7/5/3-1 rule for mutual funds?

The 7/5/3-1 rule is a rule of thumb for retail fund savings plans, not a regulatory requirement, and it does not apply to venture funds. Article 9 venture funds are alternative investment funds, often European Venture Capital Funds (EuVECA), not UCITS, and set concentration limits in their fund documents.

6\. What criteria must companies meet to attract Article 9 investment?

Financial market participants managing Article 9 funds evaluate potential portfolio companies across multiple dimensions: demonstrated contribution to specific environmental or social objectives through quantified impact metrics; evidence of avoiding significant harm across all six EU Taxonomy environmental objectives; good governance practices including board-level sustainability oversight and transparent reporting; scalability with potential for meaningful emissions reduction (typically 100,000+ tonnes CO₂e avoided); alignment or clear path towards EU Taxonomy technical screening criteria; robust impact measurement using recognised frameworks. The investment strategy favours founders treating requirements as strategic opportunities rather than compliance burdens, demonstrating genuine commitment to sustainable investment objectives alongside business viability.

7\. How should founders prepare for potential SFDR 2.0 changes?

Rather than optimising for specific SFDR articles that may change, founders should focus on building authentic capabilities: robust impact measurement using recognised frameworks demonstrating contribution to environmental or social objectives; genuine governance structures embedding sustainability into company culture; systematic DNSH assessment strengthening business resilience; transparent reporting on both positive impacts and challenges; alignment with established sustainable finance principles including additionality and accountability. Investment decisions by leading financial market participants increasingly look beyond regulatory categories to assess substantive sustainability performance, suggesting founders with authentic impact capabilities remain attractive regardless of classification system evolution under proposed changes to the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation.

8\. What documentation do Article 9 funds require during due diligence?

Financial products pursuing sustainable investment objectives conduct extensive due diligence requiring comprehensive documentation: detailed impact thesis explaining how technology delivers environmental or social objectives; quantified impact metrics with transparent methodology; DNSH assessment based on the principal adverse impact indicators; ESG governance structures including policies and oversight mechanisms; financial projections integrated with impact scaling models; supply chain sustainability analysis; EU Taxonomy alignment assessment or roadmap; stakeholder engagement evidence; risk assessment covering financial and sustainability dimensions. Asset managers appreciate founders who proactively prepare documentation demonstrating sophisticated understanding of sustainable finance requirements rather than treating sustainability as compliance afterthought, particularly regarding good governance practices and reference benchmark alignment expectations.

Next step

Turn climate risk or ESG data into a decision?

In a 30-minute intro call we map where your biggest lever is, with no obligation.

[Book an intro call](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/contact?hsLang=en)

![Johannes Fiegenbaum](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/Johannes_07-modified.png)

### Johannes Fiegenbaum

ESG and sustainability consultant based in Hamburg, specialised in VSME reporting, carbon accounting and climate risk analysis. Works with mid-sized companies, investors and financial institutions, and developed the VSME reporting software VSEasy together with clients. 

[More about](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/about-me?hsLang=en)

Related articles

## You may also like

### [Climate VC & Impact Investing Impact Carry in VC: Link Carried Interest to ESG Outcomes Impact Carry combines financial goals with measurable impact objectives, transforming the compensation structure in venture capital (VC). The idea: VC teams receive their share of ... Read more →](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/impact-carry-financial-returns-social-environmental-goals-vc?hsLang=en)

### [Climate VC & Impact Investing 4 Types of Climate Startups That Will Struggle to Raise in 2025 Read more →](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/4-types-of-climate-startups-that-will-struggle-to-raise-in-2025?hsLang=en)

### [EU Taxonomy EU Taxonomy for Startups: Unlock Sustainable Growth and Green Financing Read more →](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/eu-taxonomy-startups-sustainable-growth-green-financing?hsLang=en)

### [Supply Chain & EUDR ESG Questionnaire Template: 20 Questions for Companies & Suppliers Read more →](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/the-ultimate-guide-to-esg-questionnaires-understanding-the-relevance-components-and-data-collection-for-companies?hsLang=en)

### [Carbon Accounting & Scope 3 How Banks and Family Offices Can Measure and Reduce Financed Emissions Read more →](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/measuring-reducing-financed-emissions-banks-family-offices?hsLang=en)

### [VSME ESG Implementation Strategy: A Step-by-Step Guide Read more →](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/implementing-esg-criteria-a-beginners-guide-to-sustainability?hsLang=en)

##### Johannes Fiegenbaum

Johannes Fiegenbaum

I turn climate risk and ESG data into capital and financing decisions. For mid-market companies and investors, data-driven. From Hamburg, for companies across Europe.

##### Tools

Tools

- [Atlas](https://atlas.fiegenbaum.solutions/en)

##### Services

Services

- [Climate Risk Assessment](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/climate-risk-analysis-for-companies)
- [VSME Reporting](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/vsme-reporting-for-smes)
- [Company Carbon Footprint](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/company-carbon-footprint-methods-tools-best-practice)
- [Double Materiality Assessment](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/double-materiality-analysis-definition-process-best-practice)

##### Fiegenbaum Solutions

Fiegenbaum  
Solutions

- [About me](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/about-me)
- [Blog](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog)
- [Contact](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/contact)

[![1% for the Planet Business Member](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/1ftp_BusinessMember_Horizontal_FullColor-250x107-faa8874b-96e3-41e2-bbbe-9303832ac91c.png)](https://www.onepercentfortheplanet.org/)

- [Legal Notice](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/legal-notice)
- [Privacy Policy](https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/privacy-policy)

© 2026 Fiegenbaum Solutions

<https://www.linkedin.com/in/johannesfiegenbaum/>

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "BlogPosting",
  "author" : {
    "@type" : "Person",
    "name" : "Johannes Fiegenbaum",
    "url" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/author/johannes-fiegenbaum"
  },
  "dateModified" : "2025-11-07T20:38:27.174Z",
  "datePublished" : "2025-04-02T13:29:53.000Z",
  "headline" : "How to Position Your (Climate) Tech Startup for Article 9 VC Funds",
  "image" : [ "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/tom-parkes-Ns-BIiW_cNU-unsplash%20%281%29.jpg" ],
  "mainEntityOfPage" : {
    "@id" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/how-to-position-your-climate-tech-startup-for-article-9-vc-funds",
    "@type" : "WebPage"
  },
  "publisher" : {
    "@type" : "Organization",
    "logo" : {
      "@type" : "ImageObject",
      "url" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/FS_Logo.svg"
    },
    "name" : "Fiegenbaum & Cie. GmbH"
  }
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@id" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/#organization",
  "@type" : "Organization",
  "areaServed" : {
    "@type" : "Place",
    "name" : "European Union"
  },
  "description" : "Nachhaltigkeitsberatung mit Fokus auf Klimarisikoanalyse, ESG-Reporting (CSRD, VSME) und Climate Tech Investmentberatung.",
  "employee" : {
    "@id" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/#founder"
  },
  "founder" : {
    "@id" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/#founder"
  },
  "image" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/Branding/Fiegenbaum-Solutions_Logo.svg",
  "knowsAbout" : [ "ESG Reporting", "CSRD Compliance", "VSME Standard", "Climate Risk Analysis", "EURO-CORDEX", "CMIP6", "Scope 3 Emissions", "Scenario Analysis", "Sustainability Strategy", "Climate Tech Investment" ],
  "logo" : {
    "@type" : "ImageObject",
    "url" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/Branding/Fiegenbaum-Solutions_Logo.svg"
  },
  "name" : "Fiegenbaum Solutions",
  "sameAs" : [ "https://www.linkedin.com/in/johannesfiegenbaum/" ],
  "url" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions"
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@id" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/#founder",
  "@type" : "Person",
  "affiliation" : [ {
    "@type" : "Organization",
    "description" : "Climate tech angel syndicate (Venture Partner)",
    "name" : "Climate Insiders",
    "url" : "https://climateinsiders.com/"
  } ],
  "alumniOf" : {
    "@type" : "Organization",
    "name" : "Universität Tübingen",
    "url" : "https://uni-tuebingen.de/"
  },
  "description" : "ESG consultant and climate tech investment advisor based in Hamburg. Specializing in VSME reporting, carbon accounting, and climate risk analysis for mid-sized companies, investors, and financial institutions.",
  "image" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/hubfs/Johannes_07-modified.png",
  "jobTitle" : "ESG Consultant & Climate Tech Investment Advisor | CSRD, VSME & Climate Risk Specialist",
  "knowsAbout" : [ "CSRD", "VSME", "ESG Reporting", "Climate Risk Analysis", "EU Taxonomy", "TNFD", "Climate Tech Investment", "Sustainability Strategy", "Carbon Accounting", "Article 9 Funds" ],
  "name" : "Johannes Fiegenbaum",
  "publishingPrinciples" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/en/legal-notice#editorial",
  "sameAs" : [ "https://www.linkedin.com/in/johannesfiegenbaum/" ],
  "url" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/ueber-mich",
  "worksFor" : {
    "@id" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/#organization"
  }
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@id" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/#website",
  "@type" : "WebSite",
  "inLanguage" : [ "de-DE", "en-EU" ],
  "name" : "Fiegenbaum Solutions",
  "publisher" : {
    "@id" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions/#organization"
  },
  "url" : "https://www.fiegenbaum.solutions"
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity" : [ {
    "@type" : "Question",
    "acceptedAnswer" : {
      "@type" : "Answer",
      "text" : "Article 9 funds are financial products with sustainable investment as their objective under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation SFDR. These impact funds must demonstrate that environmental or social objectives form their primary investment purpose. Financial market participants offering Article 9 products face strictest disclosure requirements and must prove portfolio companies contribute to sustainable development whilst following good governance practices and avoiding significant harm to other sustainability objectives."
    },
    "name" : "What defines an Article 9 fund under SFDR?"
  }, {
    "@type" : "Question",
    "acceptedAnswer" : {
      "@type" : "Answer",
      "text" : "The fundamental distinction lies in investment objectives. Article 8 funds promote environmental or social characteristics but don't require sustainability as primary objective, financial returns remain dominant with ESG integration supporting investment strategy. Article 9 funds must demonstrate that sustainable investment objectives form the core purpose, requiring portfolio companies to deliver measurable positive impact on environmental or social objectives. The investment process, disclosure requirements, and verification standards differ substantially, with Article 9 representing significantly higher bar for sustainable finance classification."
    },
    "name" : "How do Article 9 funds differ from Article 8 sustainable funds?"
  }, {
    "@type" : "Question",
    "acceptedAnswer" : {
      "@type" : "Answer",
      "text" : "Leading Article 9 funds investing in climate tech include Climentum Capital (focusing on avoided emissions at scale), Planet A Ventures (broad climate tech mandate), and Seaya Andromeda (growth-stage Southern Europe climate). Evaluation criteria should include impact measurement frameworks, sector expertise, portfolio support beyond capital, alignment between fund's sustainable investment objectives and your technology's environmental objectives, and network effects. Asset managers with strong relationships to corporate partners provide most strategic value. These impact funds typically operate in European markets targeting companies with demonstrable contribution to environmental or social characteristics."
    },
    "name" : "What are the top Article 9 funds for climate tech startups?"
  }, {
    "@type" : "Question",
    "acceptedAnswer" : {
      "@type" : "Answer",
      "text" : "There is no single official count. The number of Article 9 products has experienced significant volatility since SFDR implementation, with numerous management companies reclassifying products from Article 9 to Article 8 following regulatory scrutiny. The climate tech subset represents smaller but growing portion, with dozens of dedicated impact funds targeting early-stage climate solutions. Fund flows data shows that whilst overall Article 9 assets experienced temporary reduction during 2023-2024, highest-quality sustainable investment products maintained investor confidence through transparent reporting on environmental and social objectives."
    },
    "name" : "How many Article 9 funds currently operate in Europe?"
  }, {
    "@type" : "Question",
    "acceptedAnswer" : {
      "@type" : "Answer",
      "text" : "The 7/5/3-1 rule is a rule of thumb for retail fund savings plans, not a regulatory requirement, and it does not apply to venture funds. Article 9 venture funds are alternative investment funds, often European Venture Capital Funds (EuVECA), not UCITS, and set concentration limits in their fund documents."
    },
    "name" : "What is the 7/5/3-1 rule for mutual funds?"
  }, {
    "@type" : "Question",
    "acceptedAnswer" : {
      "@type" : "Answer",
      "text" : "Financial market participants managing Article 9 funds evaluate potential portfolio companies across multiple dimensions: demonstrated contribution to specific environmental or social objectives through quantified impact metrics; evidence of avoiding significant harm across all six EU Taxonomy environmental objectives; good governance practices including board-level sustainability oversight and transparent reporting; scalability with potential for meaningful emissions reduction (typically 100,000+ tonnes CO₂e avoided); alignment or clear path towards EU Taxonomy technical screening criteria; robust impact measurement using recognised frameworks. The investment strategy favours founders treating requirements as strategic opportunities rather than compliance burdens, demonstrating genuine commitment to sustainable investment objectives alongside business viability."
    },
    "name" : "What criteria must companies meet to attract Article 9 investment?"
  }, {
    "@type" : "Question",
    "acceptedAnswer" : {
      "@type" : "Answer",
      "text" : "Rather than optimising for specific SFDR articles that may change, founders should focus on building authentic capabilities: robust impact measurement using recognised frameworks demonstrating contribution to environmental or social objectives; genuine governance structures embedding sustainability into company culture; systematic DNSH assessment strengthening business resilience; transparent reporting on both positive impacts and challenges; alignment with established sustainable finance principles including additionality and accountability. Investment decisions by leading financial market participants increasingly look beyond regulatory categories to assess substantive sustainability performance, suggesting founders with authentic impact capabilities remain attractive regardless of classification system evolution under proposed changes to the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation."
    },
    "name" : "How should founders prepare for potential SFDR 2.0 changes?"
  }, {
    "@type" : "Question",
    "acceptedAnswer" : {
      "@type" : "Answer",
      "text" : "Financial products pursuing sustainable investment objectives conduct extensive due diligence requiring comprehensive documentation: detailed impact thesis explaining how technology delivers environmental or social objectives; quantified impact metrics with transparent methodology; DNSH assessment based on the principal adverse impact indicators; ESG governance structures including policies and oversight mechanisms; financial projections integrated with impact scaling models; supply chain sustainability analysis; EU Taxonomy alignment assessment or roadmap; stakeholder engagement evidence; risk assessment covering financial and sustainability dimensions. Asset managers appreciate founders who proactively prepare documentation demonstrating sophisticated understanding of sustainable finance requirements rather than treating sustainability as compliance afterthought, particularly regarding good governance practices and reference benchmark alignment expectations."
    },
    "name" : "What documentation do Article 9 funds require during due diligence?"
  } ]
}
```