Double Materiality: A Strategic Approach to CSRD Compliance in 2026
Starting in 2026, double materiality will become mandatory for companies in the EU – a concept that...
By: Johannes Fiegenbaum on 9/19/25 10:08 PM
How do you make your company crisis-proof? The answer lies in measurable resilience KPIs. Companies in Germany are under growing pressure to not only increase their adaptability but also document it transparently – driven by laws such as the Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). But how do you implement this in practice?
The 5 most important KPIs for genuine resilience:
Our conclusion: With these KPIs, you not only create transparency but also strengthen your competitiveness. Through clear measurement methods, integration into ERP systems, and strategic linking with ESG goals, you can purposefully control and document your resilience. Let's work together to harness the opportunities that lie in the measurability of resilience.
Metrics make resilience tangible. Many German companies have already established sustainability strategies, but often lack systematic success measurement. KPIs create the necessary transparency to purposefully control adaptation measures and increase their effectiveness. But how exactly do KPIs contribute to making resilience measurable and manageable?
The EU Taxonomy Regulation clearly shows how important precise measurement methods are: companies must document the sustainability of their economic activities in a traceable manner. This is where resilience KPIs come into play. They not only provide the data basis to meet regulatory requirements but also help uncover operational weaknesses and identify improvement potential. These regulatory requirements simultaneously provide a foundation for translating KPIs into strategic measures.
A clear strategic alignment emerges when KPIs are closely linked to corporate objectives. Especially in an environment characterized by complex supply chains and strong export orientation, metrics are needed that equally reflect local and global risks. Successful resilience strategies consider this complexity by developing KPI systems that include different time horizons and stakeholder interests.
The CSRD reporting obligation additionally underscores the importance of KPIs. Beyond pure numerical values, it also requires qualitative assessments of a company's adaptability. KPIs can serve as a bridge here, linking regulatory requirements with strategic decisions.
The integration of resilience KPIs into ERP and BI systems opens new possibilities: data can be captured and analyzed in real-time. This allows recommendations for action and adaptation strategies to be dynamically adjusted – a decisive advantage in a constantly changing environment.
ESG KPIs also play a central role in financing. They enable companies to directly link sustainability goals with favorable credit conditions, creating financial flexibility while simultaneously strengthening the focus on resilience.
Stakeholder management also benefits from transparent metrics. Investors, customers, and business partners today expect detailed information about climate risks and adaptation measures. KPIs create clarity and trust by making complex relationships understandable. This not only strengthens reputation but also opens new business opportunities.
Another important point is sector specificity. German industries have different requirements for resilience KPIs. Automotive manufacturers, for example, focus on the resilience of their supply chains and progress in electrification, while energy companies prioritize topics like grid stability and the expansion of renewable energy. Successful KPI systems consider these industry-specific requirements and deliver metrics that are both comparable and meaningful. They form the foundation for consistent implementation and improvement – a decisive factor for the success of German companies.
An organization's ability to adapt to change forms the backbone of every successful resilience strategy. This KPI evaluates how quickly and efficiently companies can respond to external influences – whether through climate risks, supply chain disruptions, or new regulatory requirements. Unlike static metrics, this metric considers the dynamic ability of a company to continuously evolve without losing sight of its core competencies. But how can this adaptability be concretely measured?
Some central indicators are decision-making speed, the ability to adapt structures, innovation rates, and financial resources allocated for adaptations. Companies in Germany can, for example, measure the average time from problem identification to solution implementation or the percentage of employees who have completed climate adaptation training in the last twelve months.
A decisive factor for adaptability is employee development. Important indicators here include the time spent on continuing education or the number of interdisciplinary projects focused on sustainability. Climate adaptation means not only responding to acute weather extremes but also integrating long-term climate trends into business strategy.
Practical metrics include, for example, response time during climate-related disruptions, the number of alternative strategies for different climate scenarios, or the degree of diversification in climate-resilient business areas. An example from industry: How quickly can production be relocated to alternative sites?
Another important aspect is the integration of climate data into operational decisions. This can be measured by capturing how many business processes consider climatic variables or how frequently climate data is used in strategic decision-making processes.
The integration of ESG goals (Environmental, Social, and Governance) is reflected, among other things, in the speed with which sustainability goals are implemented into operational processes. Measurable indicators for this include the time until ESG guidelines are implemented, the number of departments actively working on sustainability goals, or the percentage of executives whose compensation is linked to ESG performance.
Companies with high adaptability can also adapt their activities more quickly to new regulatory requirements. This can be measured by how long it takes for new projects to comply with taxonomy-eligible criteria or by the percentage of investments that meet these criteria from the outset.
Much of the relevant data – such as project durations, training budgets, or process changes – is already captured in ERP systems. The challenge lies in intelligently linking this data to generate meaningful metrics. This digital integration forms the basis for targeted improvements.
The standardization of such metrics also facilitates benchmarking and comparability between companies. German companies can develop industry-specific reference values, supported by established frameworks such as ISO 14001 or the German Sustainability Code.
Continuous monitoring of adaptability enables early identification of potential problems – before they manifest in operational disruptions.
By linking these metrics with incentive systems, adaptability becomes a strategic management tool. Leaders are motivated to invest more in flexibility and innovation capacity, which promotes long-term organizational development.
With precise measurements, companies can deploy their resources specifically where they have the greatest impact – whether through training programs, IT infrastructure expansion, or organizational restructuring. This way, adaptability is not only measured but actively enhanced.
Measuring and purposefully reducing climate risks is a crucial foundation for future-ready business models. This KPI covers both physical risks – such as extreme weather, floods, or droughts – as well as transitional risks arising from regulatory changes, market shifts, or technological innovations. Instead of focusing exclusively on damage control, companies can use this metric to view climate risks as strategic opportunities and develop appropriate measures.
Data collection occurs through a combination of exposure assessment and mitigation progress analysis. Exposure is determined by factors such as the percentage of climate-vulnerable business areas, dependencies on sensitive raw materials, or infrastructure vulnerabilities. Progress in risk mitigation is evaluated based on protective measures, diversified supply chains, or emergency plans. This data provides the foundation for targeted and effective climate strategies.
German companies consider both short-term weather extremes and long-term climate trends in their risk models. Physical risks can be quantified through metrics such as the number of climate-related operational disruptions, associated costs, or the availability of alternative locations.
For transitional risks, indicators such as revenue share from EU taxonomy-compliant activities, time to compliance with new climate regulations, or investments in climate-resilient technologies play a role. Particularly important is the integration of climate scenarios into business planning – for example, through the number of climate pathways considered or regular updates to risk models.
Another central point is the effectiveness of early warning systems: How quickly can climate-related risks be identified and communicated? This includes both technical monitoring systems and organizational processes that enable rapid response.
The importance of climate risks in ESG reporting is growing – not least due to requirements such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the EU Taxonomy. Important indicators here include the percentage of taxonomy-eligible activities and the integration of climate data into financial reports.
For Scope 3 emissions in the supply chain, relevant metrics include the percentage of suppliers with their own climate goals, the average CO₂ intensity per euro purchased, or the number of alternative suppliers for critical components. Such data helps minimize dependencies while complying with regulatory requirements.
Investments in climate resilience can be presented both as a percentage of total investments and as an absolute sum in euros per year. It's crucial to distinguish preventive measures from reactive adaptations, as the former are often more cost-effective in the long term.
Much of the required climate risk data is already available in existing systems or can be collected with minimal effort. Operational metrics such as production outages, transport delays, or raw material price fluctuations are often already captured and need only be supplemented with climate-specific categories.
Financial indicators such as climate-related insurance costs, investments in adaptation measures, or additional costs from alternative procurement routes are usually stored in ERP or controlling systems. Through appropriate allocations, this data can be evaluated in a climate-specific manner.
The quality of data can be assessed based on criteria such as the number of sites with climate monitoring, the frequency of risk analyses, or the completeness of supplier data. Standardized frameworks such as the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) provide clear structures for consistent data collection. This way, the collected information becomes an integral part of the overarching resilience strategy.
The systematic collection and use of this data leads to clear action options. Continuous monitoring enables proactive measures, such as adapting production cycles to seasonal weather conditions, increasing inventory levels before critical periods, or developing alternative transport routes.
Clearly defined KPIs also support well-founded investment decisions. Companies can, for example, incorporate long-term climatic developments into location analyses, align technology investments with climate resilience, or include appropriate clauses in supplier contracts. Incentive systems – such as climate risk-adjusted bonuses for management – also underscore the strategic importance of the topic.
Through the monetization of climate risks, the return on investment of adaptation measures becomes measurable. This includes both cost savings through preventive measures and additional revenue through climate-resilient business models. With these approaches, companies can strengthen their strategic decisions while simultaneously opening new optimization opportunities.
The resilience of supply chains is more than just protection against disruptions for German companies – it's a genuine competitive advantage. The Supply Chain Resilience Index measures how well a company is able to anticipate, respond to, and quickly recover from supply chain disruptions. It goes beyond conventional efficiency metrics and evaluates aspects such as supplier diversification, geographical distribution of critical components, alternative procurement routes, and the speed with which disruptions can be addressed.
What makes the index particularly useful: it considers both short-term shocks and long-term structural changes. Companies can thus identify vulnerabilities and invest specifically in resilient structures. At the same time, the index supports building stable partnerships – an approach that is also closely connected to the regulatory requirements and ESG goals that we'll examine more closely in the next section.
Since January 1, 2023, German companies must comply with the requirements of the Supply Chain Act (LkSG). This law initially applies to companies with over 3,000 employees and from January 1, 2024, to companies with 1,000 or more employees. It requires comprehensive due diligence regarding human rights and environmental protection throughout the supply chain. This includes risk management systems, risk analyses, preventive measures, and complaint mechanisms.
The Supply Chain Resilience Index helps companies meet these requirements by integrating processes for identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks. With the upcoming EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), requirements will become even stricter: compared to the LkSG, this directive provides for civil liability for violations.
Another topic gaining increasing importance is the consideration of Scope 3 emissions in supply chain reporting. Regulations such as California's SB 253 show how closely supply chain resilience and climate risk management are interconnected. The index offers companies a way to both achieve their ESG goals and comply with regulatory requirements.
The Supply Chain Resilience Index is an important building block for a comprehensive resilience strategy, particularly regarding climate risks. Climate-related supply chain disruptions require precise identification of climate-specific vulnerabilities. The index considers factors such as the percentage of critical suppliers in climate-vulnerable regions, lead times for alternative procurement sources, and the availability of backup suppliers.
The climate resilience of suppliers themselves also plays a role. Criteria such as climate adaptation plans, investments in resilient infrastructure, and responsiveness to weather-related disruptions flow into the assessment. Additionally, transport resilience is analyzed – for example, through alternative routes, multimodal logistics options, and the evaluation of critical infrastructure such as ports or rail hubs.
Much of the data needed for the Supply Chain Resilience Index is already available in existing ERP systems, supplier management platforms, or procurement tools. Metrics such as supplier numbers, order volumes, or delivery times can easily be extended with resilience dimensions. Operational metrics such as supplier qualification duration or the percentage of strategic partnerships can be directly derived from procurement systems. Financial indicators such as additional costs from rush orders or storage costs for safety stock are often stored in controlling systems.
Data quality is ensured through standardized supplier assessments, regular audits, or digital monitoring tools. Many companies extend their existing supplier scorecards with resilience criteria, so completely new systems aren't necessary. Automated data collection – for example, through IoT, GPS tracking, or API connections – significantly reduces manual effort and enables real-time monitoring of delivery status, inventory levels, and transport movements.
The targeted use of the Supply Chain Resilience Index opens concrete action possibilities to minimize risks and leverage new opportunities. Preventive measures such as building alternative supply sources, strategic inventory, or flexible contract structures can be controlled using clearly defined KPIs. Furthermore, the index facilitates targeted supplier development by systematically revealing resilience gaps – a crucial step to ensure long-term stability of the supply chain and the company.
This KPI creates a direct connection between sustainability goals and a company's financial performance. It shows how ESG initiatives influence key financial metrics such as return on capital, financing costs, or market valuation. This isn't just about isolated considerations, but about the concrete economic impacts of sustainable business practices.
The focus is on both short-term cost effects and long-term value increases that can be achieved through stronger ESG performance. Companies can thus demonstrate that investments in sustainability not only meet regulatory requirements but also bring economic benefits. This connection is crucial for convincing stakeholders of the profitability of sustainable strategies and justifying continuous investments in resilience measures.
The EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which has been gradually introduced since January 1, 2024, requires German companies to provide detailed reports on their sustainability performance. From 2028, large companies and listed SMEs must disclose their ESG data according to ESRS. A KPI like ESG-linked financial performance helps meet these requirements while documenting the economic benefits of compliance.
The EU Taxonomy Regulation also plays an important role. Companies must report the share of taxonomy-compliant revenues, investments, and operating expenses. With the growing focus on Sustainable Finance, the connection between ESG goals and financial performance is becoming increasingly important. German banks are increasingly considering ESG criteria in lending decisions, while institutional investors demand evidence of the profitability of sustainable business models.
The KPI makes climate risks and opportunities financially measurable and manageable. Physical climate risks, such as extreme weather events, can cause high costs – from production outages to infrastructure damage. The KPI shows how preventive measures can reduce these costs and strengthen operational stability.
Transition risks arising from the shift to a low-carbon economy are also considered. Investments in energy efficiency or renewable energy may initially be cost-intensive but lead to lower operating costs in the medium term and reduce regulatory risks. The KPI helps justify these investments and monitor their profitability.
Furthermore, the KPI highlights climate opportunities arising from transformation. Companies that invest early in climate-resilient business models can open new markets, secure competitive advantages, and benefit from increasing demand for sustainable products. These financial effects are continuously monitored and integrated into strategic planning.
Most data for this KPI is already available in existing finance and controlling systems. Metrics such as revenue, EBITDA, return on capital, or financing costs are regularly captured anyway and can be directly linked to ESG initiatives. Supplementary ESG data, such as energy costs, CO₂ levies, or sustainability projects, can be derived from cost center accounting.
Modern ERP systems like SAP or Oracle facilitate automated data collection. Using business intelligence tools, this data can be analyzed and visualized in real-time to show the connection between ESG performance and financial performance.
Integrating the KPI into existing reporting cycles is straightforward. Quarterly and annual reports can easily be extended with ESG metrics. Management dashboards can also be adapted so that executives can keep track of the financial impacts of their sustainability strategy at all times.
This KPI supports data-driven decisions for investments in sustainability projects. Instead of viewing ESG initiatives as pure cost factors, companies can systematically evaluate their return on investment. Energy efficiency measures can be assessed based on their payback period and long-term savings potential, while investments in renewable energy can be justified through lower energy costs and reduced CO₂ levies.
Furthermore, the KPI facilitates communication with stakeholders. Investors, banks, and business partners receive clear evidence that sustainability initiatives are not only ethically sensible but also economically worthwhile. This transparency can lead to better financing conditions, as ESG-oriented lenders and investors often reward sustainable companies with more favorable interest rates or higher valuations.
Operational improvements are promoted through continuous monitoring of financial performance. Teams can identify which measures have the greatest financial impact and purposefully implement further optimizations. This way, ESG-linked financial performance becomes a central component of a comprehensive resilience strategy.
This KPI measures the trust and engagement of various stakeholder groups – from investors and customers to employees and communities. It shows how successfully a company strengthens its business foundation and remains competitive through open communication, credible sustainability practices, and stable partnerships.
The index combines measurable quantities such as customer retention rates, employee turnover, or investor satisfaction with qualitative assessments of stakeholder communication. The benefits of this KPI become particularly clear during crisis times: companies with high trust can respond more quickly to challenges, receive easier support for important decisions, and secure a stable foundation for the future. In the following, we'll examine how this index supports strategic management through a combination of data and assessments.
The EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) massively expands reporting obligations in Germany – from previously 550 to around 15,000 companies. This makes stakeholder engagement a central component of ESG reporting. Companies must report according to the principle of double materiality: How do sustainability risks affect their business, and what impacts do they themselves have on sustainability-related topics?
Additionally, the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG), which has applied to companies with more than 1,000 employees since January 1, 2024, emphasizes the importance of stakeholder engagement. Companies are required to collaborate with important partners along the value chain to fulfill their due diligence obligations.
Given the increasing scrutiny of greenwashing, it's more important than ever to make credible ESG statements. A systematic approach to stakeholder engagement helps develop trustworthy sustainability strategies and communicate them transparently.
Stakeholder trust plays a central role in managing climate risks. Physical risks such as extreme weather events often require quick decisions and support from various groups. Companies with established trust structures can rely on cooperation from employees, suppliers, and local communities in such situations, for example, during production relocations or investments in climate-resilient infrastructure.
Intensive stakeholder engagement is also essential for transition risks – such as the shift to low-carbon business models. Customers must be convinced of new, more sustainable products, investors need clear information about the costs and benefits of transformation, and employees expect security in a changing corporate structure. A high trust index significantly facilitates such transition processes.
Furthermore, opportunities arise: sustainable innovations benefit from direct customer feedback, while investors are more likely to support long-term growth strategies from trustworthy companies. Collaborations with NGOs or research institutions can also be more easily realized based on solid trust relationships.
Much of the data required for this KPI is already available in a company's existing systems. Customer satisfaction values from CRM systems, employee retention rates from HR databases, or investor feedback can be directly used. Modern survey tools can additionally capture targeted stakeholder feedback on sustainability topics.
Social media monitoring also provides insights into public perception and trust in real-time. This data can be combined with traditional metrics to obtain a comprehensive picture of stakeholder trust. External evaluations from ESG rating agencies such as S&P, Sustainalytics, or MSCI also flow into the index. Deutsche Börse Group, for example, aims to remain among the top 10% in three leading ESG ratings. Such benchmarks strengthen the credibility of internal assessments and provide starting points for targeted measures.
The index enables early identification of potential trust issues and targeted countermeasures. If, for example, customer satisfaction with sustainability topics declines or investors express concerns about climate strategy, companies can respond quickly – a clear advantage in a time when ESG topics are increasingly in focus.
Furthermore, the index helps tailor communication strategies precisely to the needs of different target groups – investors, customers, or employees. The Stakeholder Trust and Engagement Index thus provides a practice-oriented foundation for continuously improving ESG measures and securing long-term business success.
Implementing the five resilience KPIs requires thoughtful technical and organizational measures. German companies face the task of meeting both national and European reporting obligations while developing effective management tools. With clear objectives and dashboard-based monitoring, strategies can be controlled and adjusted in real-time.
Modern dashboards offer the possibility to display all five KPIs in real-time. These systems link data from various sources – from ERP systems and HR databases to external climate data providers – enabling continuous monitoring of resilience performance.
Automated data collection reduces effort and minimizes error sources. Especially for supply chain data or climate risk indicators, automated integrations save valuable time and significantly improve data quality.
Another advantage: early warning systems. If, for example, the Supply Chain Resilience Index falls below a defined threshold or climate risk exposure increases, automatic notifications can be sent to responsible teams. This enables early implementation of countermeasures.
A central compliance dashboard helps capture all KPI data according to CSRD and LkSG. The principle of double materiality is crucial here: it's necessary to transparently present both the financial impacts of sustainability risks and one's own influences on sustainability-related topics.
The European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) provide clear guidelines for this. Particularly relevant are standards ESRS E1 (Climate Change), ESRS S1 (Own Workforce), and ESRS G1 (Business Conduct). These can be directly linked to resilience KPIs and provide a structured foundation for reporting.
The following table shows an overview of KPI targets and their progress:
KPI | Baseline (2023) | Target Value (2025) | Current Value | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Organizational Adaptive Capacity | 65.4% | 80.0% | 72.1% | ↗ |
Climate Risk Mitigation Progress | €1,234,567.89 | €2,500,000.00 | €1,876,543.21 | ↗ |
Supply Chain Resilience Index | 7.2 | 8.5 | 7.8 | ↗ |
ESG-Linked Financial Performance | 12.3% | 15.0% | 13.7% | ↗ |
Stakeholder Trust Index | 78.9% | 85.0% | 81.2% | ↗ |
This compact presentation enables executives to recognize progress at a glance and implement targeted measures when needed.
For successful implementation, the new resilience KPIs must be seamlessly integrated into existing reporting processes. Many German companies already have sophisticated controlling systems that can be adapted and expanded.
Reporting cycles should be carefully coordinated. While some KPIs, such as the Stakeholder Trust Index, may require quarterly updates, others like Climate Risk Mitigation Progress can be monitored monthly or even in real-time. This flexibility allows companies to maintain comprehensive oversight while avoiding information overload for decision-makers.
A solo consultant supporting companies to shape the future and achieve long-term growth.
More aboutStarting in 2026, double materiality will become mandatory for companies in the EU – a concept that...
How Do Companies Prioritize ESG Topics? The answer lies in two approaches: VSME (Value Stream...
ESG data has become indispensable for companies, not only to meet legal requirements but also to...