EU Omnibus Package 2025: Simplifying CSRD Reporting for SMEs and Large Companies

The Omnibus Package is part of the EU Commission’s regulatory simplification initiative. The goal is to ease existing reporting obligations without weakening the impact of the CSRD. The package complements existing initiatives such as the REFIT process and the EU Competitiveness Agenda. The CSRD rules are becoming simpler, more affordable, and will affect fewer companies. The EU Omnibus Package 2025 is expected to bring the following changes:

• 80% fewer companies required to report: SMEs benefit in particular. According to the European Commission, this reduction is intended to minimize the administrative burden on smaller businesses, allowing them to focus resources on core activities rather than compliance (source).
• Simplified standards (ESRS): Fewer sector-specific requirements, reduced audit demands. The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) has published updates to the ESRS to streamline disclosures and prioritize material topics (source).
• New deadlines: Reports for 2026/27 can be submitted later (“Stop-the-Clock”). This extension addresses concerns raised by industry groups about the readiness of reporting systems and the need for more time to adapt (source).
• Clearer thresholds: Only companies with > 1,000 employees and > €450 million in revenue are fully subject to reporting obligations. This aligns with the EU’s push for proportionality in regulation, ensuring that only larger entities face the most comprehensive requirements (source).

However, these are currently only proposals. They must still be adopted by the EU Parliament and Member States.

Conclusion: Less effort and lower costs—especially for SMEs and suppliers. Now is the time to adapt processes and strengthen ESG strategies. Early action is recommended as investors and supply chain partners increasingly expect robust sustainability data, even from companies not directly subject to the CSRD (source).

Main Changes to the CSRD in 2025

The CSRD changes can be divided into three main areas: thresholds, reporting obligations, and deadlines. Here are the details for each area.

New Thresholds for Companies Required to Report

The scope has been reduced by 80%. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) benefit from lower requirements, significantly reducing administrative burden. This adjustment allows SMEs to focus more on their ESG strategies while minimizing reporting efforts. The European Commission estimates that this change could save companies over €1.2 billion in compliance costs annually (source).

Important: For non-listed SMEs, the CSRD reporting obligation is completely eliminated. However, they are free to report voluntarily according to the simplified SME standard—for example, to prepare for future customer requirements or for investor relations. Voluntary reporting can be a strategic advantage, as many large buyers and investors are expected to request ESG data from their suppliers regardless of legal obligations (source).

Simplified Reporting Obligations

The European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) have been revised to make them more streamlined. Sector-specific requirements have been removed, and the demands for external assurance have been relaxed. This means companies can focus on material sustainability topics rather than exhaustive disclosures, making compliance more manageable (source).

New Deadlines and “Stop-the-Clock” Regulation

Additionally, a “Stop-the-Clock” regulation has been introduced. For the reporting years 2026 and 2027, companies will have more time to prepare for the new requirements. This delay was welcomed by business associations who argued that the original timeline was too ambitious for many firms (source).

Impact on German Companies

The new CSRD regulations have concrete implications for German businesses. Here’s an overview of which changes affect corporations, mid-sized companies, and suppliers.

Under the new standards, many reporting obligations are eliminated, while key KPIs remain in place. What’s new is the differentiation of obligations based on company size. Large companies with more than 1,000 employees and annual revenue over €450 million must still report comprehensively on their EU Taxonomy KPIs. Many of these companies already have established reporting processes, and the focus will shift to ensuring data quality and consistency across the value chain (source).

Key Changes at a Glance:

• Companies with > 1,000 employees/€450 million revenue: comprehensive reporting obligation
• Mid-sized companies: most reporting obligations are eliminated
• Non-listed SMEs: voluntary reporting

This distinction supports the reduction targets of 25% for large companies and 35% for SMEs. Suppliers in particular benefit from the limitation of reporting obligations along the value chain.

Additionally, simplified audit requirements lead to lower costs for external audits. Small suppliers are relieved, as the cap on reporting obligations along the value chain prevents excessive information demands from larger companies. This is especially relevant in Germany, where many SMEs operate as suppliers to multinational corporations and have previously faced complex data requests (source).

Critical Voices: Relief or Setback for Climate Protection?

Although many companies welcome the proposed changes, there are also critical voices. NGO networks and some members of parliament, as well as companies, warn that the planned relief for businesses could lead to a weakening of transparency obligations. In particular, the elimination of sector-specific ESRS and the raising of thresholds could mean that significant sustainability risks are no longer systematically disclosed. The European Coalition for Corporate Justice has argued that reducing the scope could undermine the EU’s climate and human rights ambitions (source).

A frequently voiced criticism:

“The planned simplifications risk undermining core principles of the CSRD—such as double materiality and the comparability of ESG data,” says a representative of the European Coalition for Corporate Transparency.

The proposed limitation of reporting obligations along the supply chain is also viewed differently. While it protects smaller suppliers, it could at the same time lead to reduced responsibility for large companies regarding their indirect emissions and human rights risks. Some sustainability experts warn that this could make it harder for investors and stakeholders to assess the true impact of large companies (source).

Furthermore, some experts criticize that the EU is giving in too much to business pressure with these proposals, thereby diluting the original goal of the CSRD—uniform, ambitious, and future-proof sustainability reporting.

Resources for CSRD Compliance

Following the key CSRD changes, companies can leverage various tools and approaches to effectively implement the new requirements. These resources make it easier to collect and report sustainability data. The European Commission and EFRAG provide guidance and templates to help companies align with the new ESRS (source).

ESG Data Management Software

Modern ESG management systems provide companies with a platform to efficiently manage ESG data and create standardized reports. With these systems, companies can:

• Automatically collect data from different sources
• Conduct a double materiality analysis
• Calculate Scope 1 to Scope 3 emissions
• Use ESRS-compliant dashboards

Implementing such systems before 2026 ensures that the necessary processes are established in time. Leading software providers are updating their solutions to reflect the latest ESRS requirements (source).

Services from Fiegenbaum Solutions

Fiegenbaum Solutions offers consulting services tailored specifically to the requirements of the CSRD. These are especially relevant for German mid-sized companies that must meet the thresholds and audit requirements described in Chapter 2. Services include:

• Development of customized, data-driven ESG strategies
• Optimization of reporting processes through lifecycle analyses
• Support in meeting CSRD requirements

Reporting Guidelines

The ESRS guidelines form the foundation for compliant reporting. Especially relevant are:

• ESRS 1: Basic requirements—structure and concepts
• ESRS 2: Cross-cutting disclosures—governance, strategy, and risk and opportunity management
• Sector ESRS: Sector-specific metrics

A key tool is the materiality analysis to prioritize important sustainability topics. To support this, EFRAG offers voluntary reporting templates. These templates are especially helpful for companies that want to align with the ESRS structure without having to build everything from scratch (source).

With the right combination of software, consulting, and clear guidelines, companies can efficiently ensure CSRD compliance by 2026.

5 Steps to Meet the New Requirements

Implementing the new CSRD requirements is achievable with a clear plan. Here are five steps to help you efficiently meet the requirements.

Check Your Current Reporting Status

Start with a gap analysis. The goal is to identify gaps in your current sustainability report and align it with ESRS requirements. You should consider the following points:

• Existing documentation on environmental, social, and governance topics, as well as available resources and expertise
• Processes for collecting and managing relevant data
• Sustainability topics along the entire value chain

This analysis forms the basis for the next steps.

Improve Systems and Training

Optimize your systems and processes with proven ESG management tools. Use ESG data management systems to make processes more efficient.

Key actions include:

• System selection and integration
  Choose software that integrates seamlessly with your existing systems such as EMAS or ISO.
• Employee training
  Train your team on the new CSRD requirements and how to use the selected tools.
• Reporting test run
  Conduct a trial run to identify weaknesses and improve processes.

Seek Expert Support

External experts can speed up the process and provide targeted support. Fiegenbaum Solutions, for example, offers tailored ESG strategies based on double materiality. They help you integrate sustainability criteria into your business processes and select and implement suitable reporting software.

Conclusion

It remains to be seen how much the new thresholds will actually lead to less reporting in practice—because many companies along the supply chain will still need to provide ESG data despite not being required to. It also remains to be seen how uniformly the ‘Stop-the-Clock’ regulation will be implemented across Member States. According to industry analysts, the effectiveness of these reforms will depend on how national authorities interpret and enforce the new rules (source).

The EU Omnibus Package 2025 could bring significant relief in sustainability reporting. The most important change is the narrowing of the scope, which will exempt about 80% of the originally affected companies. Small and medium-sized companies in particular will benefit from this relief.

Key innovations include: fewer companies required to report, simplified ESRS requirements, and limitations on reporting along value chains.

Why early preparation is crucial: Companies that adapt in good time can benefit in several ways:

• Better access to capital thanks to strong CSRD and EU taxonomy performance. Investors are increasingly integrating ESG metrics into their decision-making (source).
• Reduced financial risks through early adjustments
• Strengthened operational resilience through optimized processes
• More efficient management of sustainability data through clear structures

With my 5-step guide, you can successfully master the entire process—from gap analysis to audit preparation.

The simplified audit requirements and standards underline the EU’s balanced approach. Use the transition period to revise your processes and meet legal deadlines with ease.

All changes described here are based on the EU Commission’s proposal from spring 2025. Final adoption by Parliament and Council is still pending.

Cost-Benefit Analysis: Expected Savings from CSRD Simplification for SMEs and Large Enterprises

The Omnibus Package introduces tangible financial relief for companies that previously faced steep compliance costs under the original CSRD framework. For small and medium-sized enterprises that fall below the new reporting thresholds, the European Commission estimates annual savings of up to €40,000 per company — covering costs related to data collection, third-party assurance, and staff training. These figures reflect a genuine recalibration of the regulatory burden placed on businesses with limited internal resources.

Large enterprises, while still subject to full reporting obligations, can also expect meaningful efficiency gains. Streamlined disclosure requirements and a reduced set of mandatory data points mean that sustainability teams can focus their efforts more strategically. Companies that have already invested in integrated ESG data management systems will benefit most, as fewer data inputs translate directly into lower operational costs per reporting cycle.

It is worth noting, however, that the long-term cost savings depend heavily on how well a company prepares now. Organisations that delay adapting their internal processes risk incurring higher costs later when deadlines become binding. A proactive approach — including early assessment of which reporting obligations still apply — remains the most cost-effective strategy regardless of company size.

CSRD Compliance Software and Tools: Selecting the Right Solution for Your Company Size

As the regulatory landscape shifts under the Omnibus Package, selecting the right compliance software has become a strategic decision rather than a purely technical one. For companies still required to report, the ability to collect, validate, and document sustainability data efficiently is essential. Modern ESG platforms now offer modular architectures, allowing organisations to activate only the features relevant to their specific reporting scope — a particularly useful characteristic given the revised and more targeted disclosure requirements introduced in 2025.

Smaller companies that remain within the reporting thresholds should prioritise solutions that offer guided workflows and pre-built templates aligned with the simplified European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). These tools reduce the need for specialist in-house knowledge and lower the barrier to producing audit-ready reports. Cloud-based platforms with strong data import capabilities are especially practical for teams without dedicated sustainability departments.

Larger enterprises, by contrast, often require software that integrates with existing ERP or financial reporting systems and supports multi-entity consolidation. When evaluating solutions, key criteria include data lineage tracking, role-based access controls, and the ability to map disclosures directly to updated ESRS requirements. Regardless of company size, any chosen tool should be flexible enough to accommodate further regulatory changes as the Omnibus Package continues its legislative journey through 2026.

FAQ

Here I answer the most frequently asked questions about the CSRD changes in 2025 in a concise format.

Is the Omnibus Package 2025 already in force?

Not yet. It is a proposal from the EU Commission that still has to go through the ordinary legislative process. Changes are possible as it progresses. Only the postponement of deadlines with “Stop the Clock” has already been adopted (source).

What will change in 2025?

The main possible changes from the EU Omnibus Package 2025 include:

• Restricted scope: The reporting obligation will only apply to large companies with more than 1,000 employees and annual revenue over €450 million.
• Revised standards: The ESRS will be simplified, and a reduced, voluntary standard will be introduced for smaller companies.
• New deadlines: For companies in the second (2026) and third (2027) waves, reporting obligations will be postponed by two years each—“Stop the Clock” mechanism.

Further details on thresholds, standards, and deadlines can be found in Chapters 2 and 3.

How does the “Stop-the-Clock” regulation work in detail?

For the reporting years 2026 and 2027, reporting obligations for the second and third waves are postponed by two years each, giving companies more time to adapt their systems and processes (source).

How do the new ESRS standards differ from the previous ones?

The ESRS are being simplified, sector-specific requirements are being removed, and the demands for external assurance are being relaxed. A reduced, voluntary standard will be introduced for smaller companies. This is intended to make reporting more proportionate and less burdensome (source).

Impact on EU SMEs

• Optional reporting: Voluntary SME standards (VSME) will be offered as a less complex alternative.
• Limitation of requirements: Restricting value chain reporting is intended to prevent large companies from imposing excessive data demands on SMEs (source).

Available Compliance Tools

• ESG management systems: These systems enable automated data collection and ESRS-compliant reporting, supporting companies in meeting both current and future sustainability requirements (source).
• Voluntary SME standards (VSME): A simplified solution for companies that are not subject to mandatory reporting.